Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Assessment of Head Displacement and Disassembly Force With Increasing Assembly Load at the Head/Trunnion Junction of
Darryl N Ramoutar1, Emilie A Crosnier2, Faiz Shivji1
1Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Background:
Most femoral components used now for total hip arthroplasty are modular, requiring a strong connection at assembly. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of assembly force on the strength of head-trunnion interface and to measure the initial displacement of the head on the trunnion with different assembly forces.
Methods:
Three assembly load levels were assessed (A: 2 kN, B: 4 kN, C: 6 kN) with 4 implants in each group. The stems were mounted in a custom rig and the respective assembly loads were applied to the head at a constant rate of 0.05 kN/s (ISO7260-10:2003). Load levels were recorded during assembly. Head displacement was measured with a laser sensor. The disassembly force was determined by a standard pull-off test.
Results:
The maximum head displacement on the trunnion was significantly different between the 2 kN group and the other 2 groups (4 kN, 6 kN, P = .029), but not between the 4 kN and 6 kN groups (P = .89). The disassembly forces between the 3 groups were significantly different (mean ± standard deviation, A: 1316 ± 223 kN; B: 2224 ± 151 kN; C: 3965 ± 344 kN; P = .007), with increasing assembly load leading to a higher pull-off force. For the 4 kN and 6 kN groups, a first peak of approximately 2.5 kN was observed on the load recordings during assembly before the required assembly load was eventually reached corresponding to sudden increase in head displacement to approximately 150 μm.
Conclusion:
An assembly force of 2 kN may be too low to overcome the frictional forces needed to engage the head and achieve maximum displacement on the trunnion and thus an assembly load of greater than 2.5 kN is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Space Trusses: Problem Solving
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
Method of Sections: Problem Solving I
Method of Joints
Since plane truss members are in the same plane, each joint is subjected to a coplanar and concurrent force system. To apply the method of joints, the first step is to...

