Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Developing a Salivary Antibody Multiplex Immunoassay to Measure Human Exposure to Environmental Pathogens
Published on: September 12, 2016
Australia's National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System 1991-2011: expanding, adapting and improving
K B Gibney1, A C Cheng1, R Hall1
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Monash University, The Alfred Centre,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia.
Australia's National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) improved in data quality and timeliness over 21 years. Enhancements like electronic reporting are key for better infectious disease surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Surveillance
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Health Information Systems
Background:
- The National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) is crucial for monitoring infectious diseases in Australia.
- Evaluating the NNDSS's performance over its initial two decades is essential for identifying areas of improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the key attributes of Australia's NNDSS, specifically flexibility, data quality, and timeliness, over its first 21 years (1991-2011).
- To describe changes in the number of notifiable diseases, diagnostic methods, data completeness, and notification delays within the NNDSS.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of notified cases within the NNDSS from 1991 to 2011, stratified by jurisdiction and time sub-period.
- Examination of trends in the number of notifiable diseases, use of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing, data completeness for key variables, and notification delays.
Main Results:
- The number of notifiable diseases increased from 37 to 65. The proportion of cases diagnosed by PCR rose significantly from 1% to 49%.
- Data completeness showed improvement, though some fields like Indigenous status (44%) and country of acquisition (24%) remained incomplete. Median notification time decreased from 11 days to 5 days.
- Despite expansion, NNDSS demonstrated improved data completeness and timeliness, likely due to mandatory laboratory reporting and electronic data transfer.
Conclusions:
- Australia's NNDSS has evolved significantly, showing improvements in data quality and timeliness over its first 21 years.
- Further enhancements, particularly a nationally integrated electronic surveillance system with electronic laboratory reporting, are recommended to strengthen infectious disease surveillance.
More Related Videos
09:31Fluorescence-based Neuraminidase Inhibition Assay to Assess the Susceptibility of Influenza Viruses to The Neuraminidase Inhibitor Class of Antivirals
Published on: April 15, 2017
06:55A High-throughput Platform for the Screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp.
Published on: November 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...