Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Safety Profile of Nivolumab Monotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Patients With Advanced Melanoma
Jeffrey S Weber1, F Stephen Hodi1, Jedd D Wolchok1
1Jeffrey S. Weber, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Jedd D. Wolchok, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Suzanne L. Topalian, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; Hewei Li, Ian M. Waxman, and Joel Jiang, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; Dirk Schadendorf, University of Essen, Essen, Germany; James Larkin, Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Georgina V. Long, Melanoma Institute Australia and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Caroline Robert, Gustave Roussy and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif-Paris Sud, France.
Abstract:
Purpose We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma and describe the management of adverse events (AEs) using established safety guidelines. Patients and Methods Safety data were pooled from four studies, including two phase III trials, with patients who received nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. We evaluated rate of treatment-related AEs, time to onset and resolution of select AEs (those with potential immunologic etiology), and impact of select AEs and suppressive immune-modulating agents (IMs) on antitumor efficacy. Results Among 576 patients, 71% (95% CI, 67% to 75%) experienced any-grade treatment-related AEs (most commonly fatigue [25%], pruritus [17%], diarrhea [13%], and rash [13%]), and 10% (95% CI, 8% to 13%) experienced grade 3 to 4 treatment-related AEs. No drug-related deaths were reported. Select AEs (occurring in 49% of patients) were most frequently skin related, GI, endocrine, and hepatic; grade 3 to 4 select AEs occurred in 4% of patients. Median time to onset of select AEs ranged from 5 weeks for skin to 15 weeks for renal AEs. Approximately 24% of patients received systemic IMs to manage select AEs, which in most cases resolved. Adjusting for number of doses, objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients who experienced treatment-related select AEs of any grade compared with those who did not. ORRs were similar in patients who did and patients who did not receive systemic IMs. Conclusion Treatment-related AEs with nivolumab monotherapy were primarily low grade, and most resolved with established safety guidelines. Use of IMs did not affect ORR, although treatment-related select AEs of any grade were associated with higher ORR, but no progression-free survival benefit.
Insights
Nivolumab monotherapy for advanced melanoma showed a favorable safety profile, with most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) being low-grade and manageable. Experiencing AEs was linked to a higher objective response rate (ORR), but not progression-free survival.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Advanced melanoma treatment landscape.
- Role of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
- Need for safety and efficacy data on nivolumab.
Purpose of the Study:
- Assess the safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
- Describe the management of treatment-related adverse events (AEs).
- Evaluate the impact of AEs on antitumor efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of pooled safety data from four studies (including two Phase III trials).
- Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks.
- Evaluation of AE rates, onset, resolution, and impact on objective response rate (ORR).
Main Results:
- 71% of 576 patients experienced any-grade treatment-related AEs; 10% had grade 3-4 AEs.
- No drug-related deaths reported.
- 49% experienced select immune-related AEs, primarily low-grade; 4% had grade 3-4.
- Higher ORR observed in patients with any-grade select AEs, but no PFS benefit.
Conclusions:
- Nivolumab monotherapy is associated with manageable, primarily low-grade AEs in advanced melanoma.
- Established safety guidelines effectively manage AEs.
- Immune-modulating agents did not impact ORR; select AEs correlated with higher ORR.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification

