Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations
Federica Durante1, Susan T Fiske2, Michele J Gelfand3
1Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; sfiske@princeton.edu federica.durante@unimib.it.
Abstract:
A cross-national study, 49 samples in 38 nations (n = 4,344), investigates whether national peace and conflict reflect ambivalent warmth and competence stereotypes: High-conflict societies (Pakistan) may need clearcut, unambivalent group images distinguishing friends from foes. Highly peaceful countries (Denmark) also may need less ambivalence because most groups occupy the shared national identity, with only a few outcasts. Finally, nations with intermediate conflict (United States) may need ambivalence to justify more complex intergroup-system stability. Using the Global Peace Index to measure conflict, a curvilinear (quadratic) relationship between ambivalence and conflict highlights how both extremely peaceful and extremely conflictual countries display lower stereotype ambivalence, whereas countries intermediate on peace-conflict present higher ambivalence. These data also replicated a linear inequality-ambivalence relationship.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Impact of Groups on Groups
Surveys
Cultural Influences on Personality
Implicit Personality Theories

