Related Experiment Videos
A review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiological studies
N H de Klerk1, D R English, B K Armstrong
1Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia.
Abstract:
Many articles in the recent epidemiological literature have discussed the effects of random error and misclassification on effect estimation, but many of these have been unclear and hard to follow. This paper reviews and interprets many of these and summarizes the use of the correlation coefficient in assessing the likely effect of measurement error on relative risk estimates for variables that are either continuous or ordered. A table of expected values of relative risks (RRs) calculated in different ways for different levels of random error is presented and the typically large expected attenuation in RR values is shown. The recommendation of taking repeated or multiple measurements whenever possible is endorsed.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Bias in Epidemiological Studies