Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Aortic Wave Reflection During Orthostatic Challenges: Influence of Body Position and Venous Pooling
William E Hughes1, Darren P Casey
1Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Background:
Aortic wave reflection (augmentation index; AIx) decreases during orthostatic challenges despite increased peripheral resistance, which is thought to be due to venous pooling. The purpose of this study was to examine if the decrease in AIx during an orthostatic challenge is due to venous pooling alone or body position manipulation.
Methods:
Twenty-three young, healthy adults (11F/12M) participated in 3 separate orthostatic challenges (5 minutes each); 60° head-up tilt (HUT), 60° HUT with bilateral rhythmic blood pressure (BP) cuff inflation on calves (75 mm Hg) to minimize venous pooling, and lower body negative pressure (LBNP; -30 mm Hg) for venous pooling independent of body position. High-fidelity radial artery pressure waveforms using applanation tonometry were recorded at minutes 2:30 and 5:00 during each condition. Aortic BP and wave reflection were analyzed from a synthesized aortic BP waveform.
Results:
Compared to resting (baseline) measurements, AIx did not significantly decrease at minutes 2:30 or 5:00 of HUT conditions (HUT 0 ± 2% vs. -3 ± 3%, 0 ± 2%; HUT w/cuffs 0 ± 2% vs. -4 ± 2%, 0 ± 2%). Conversely, LBNP substantially reduced AIx at minutes 2:30 and 5:00 (1 ± 2% vs. -15 ± 2% and -12 ± 2%; P < 0.01). When standardized to heart rate (AIx@75), AIx@75 increased relative to baseline during HUT conditions (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
In contrast to previous studies, AIx did not decrease during passive HUT, yet decreased substantially during LBNP. Despite being well matched for peripheral hemodynamics, it appears that LBNP elicits a greater effect on central hemodynamics, relative to passive HUT. Collectively, changes in body position alone do not explain differences in AIx during orthostatic conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection

