Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
Published on: July 11, 2015
Complex responses to movement-based disease control: when livestock trading helps
Jamie C Prentice1,2, Glenn Marion3, Michael R Hutchings4
1Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK jamie.prentice@glasgow.ac.uk.
New metapopulation models calculate herd-to-herd transmission for livestock diseases. Livestock movement rates impact disease control, with intermediate rates potentially increasing prevalence, complicating disease management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Mathematical Biology
- Veterinary Public Health
Background:
- Livestock disease control strategies frequently rely on managing animal movements between farms.
- Accurate assessment of herd-to-herd transmission is crucial for designing effective disease control measures.
- Existing metapopulation models, like those using R*, do not explicitly incorporate individual animal movements, limiting their application to livestock systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop novel mathematical tools for calculating R* in livestock populations considering individual movements.
- To investigate the impact of livestock movement rates on disease transmission and control efficacy.
- To analyze the implications of movement-based controls in livestock systems.
Main Methods:
- Employed next-generation matrix approaches to explicitly model individual animal movements between herds.
- Developed new methodologies for calculating the metapopulation reproduction number (R*) in systems with coupled populations.
- Simulated disease dynamics under varying livestock movement rates and control scenarios.
Main Results:
- The study introduces novel tools to calculate R* by explicitly accounting for individual movements.
- Depletion of infected individuals in the source herd significantly impacts control strategy efficacy.
- R* demonstrates a peak at intermediate livestock movement rates, suggesting complex disease dynamics under control.
Conclusions:
- Movement-based livestock disease controls can be counterintuitive; reducing movements may increase prevalence at intermediate rates.
- Optimal livestock movement rates for disease control vary, with high rates allowing control but intermediate rates potentially sustaining disease.
- Management of livestock movements requires careful consideration as interventions for one disease may exacerbate another.
More Related Videos
06:52Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases
Published on: September 29, 2014
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Migration
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...