Comparing effects: a reanalysis of two studies on season of birth bias in anorexia nervosa
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Eirin Winje1, Anne-Kari Torgalsbøen2, Cathrine Brunborg3
1Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Oslo universitetssykehus HF, Postboks 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Background:
Outcomes from studies on season of birth bias in eating disorders have been inconsistent. This inconsistency has been explained by differences in methodologies resulting in different types of effect sizes. The aim of the current study was to facilitate comparison by using the same methodology on samples from two studies with differing conclusions.
Methods:
The statistical analyses used in each study were applied to the samples from the other study and the resulting effect sizes, Cramêr's V and odds ratio (OR), were compared and discussed.
Results:
For both studies, the Cramêr's Vs ranged between 0.03 and 0.08 and the OR ranged between 0.85 and 1.31. According to common conventions, Cramêr's Vs below 0.10 and ORs below 1.44 are considered small.
Conclusion:
As a marker of one or more potential risk factors, the observed effects are considered to be small. When reanalysed allowing for direct comparisons, studies with contrasting conclusions converge towards an absence of support for a season of birth bias for patients with AN.
Related Concept Videos
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bulimia Nervosa
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
Binge Eating Disorders

