Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026
Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
Published on: February 7, 2025
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors >5 cm: A Size-Matched and
Nicola de'Angelis1, Pietro Genova, Aurelien Amiot
1Departments of *Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation †Gastroenterology, EC2M3 Equipe Universitaire ‡Pathology ∥Radiology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Université Paris Est-UPEC, Créteil, France §Department of Surgery, Ashford & St Peter's Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, Surrey, UK.
Abstract:
This study compared robotic (RR) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach >5 cm. Twelve consecutive patients who underwent RR from 2012 to 2015 were matched for tumor size and location with 24 patients who underwent LR from 2000 to 2012. The median tumor size was 7.1 cm (range, 5.5 to 11.5). GISTs were resected by wedge resection (91.7%) or distal gastrectomy. The median RR operative time was longer than that of LR (162.5 vs. 130 min, respectively; P=0.004). Only 1 LR patient required conversion. The time to flatus and hospital stay were similar between groups. Overall, 3 patients developed minor postoperative complications that were medically treated. Mortality was nil. All resections were R0. No difference was observed in the incidence of recurrence. RR was significantly more expensive (+21.6%) than LR. RR appears to be safe and feasible for GISTs>5 cm, but is associated with longer operative times and greater costs.
