Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.8K

Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching.

Patricia Hirsch1, Sophie Nolden1, Iring Koch1

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|January 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that switching between task pairs, not just within tasks, incurs performance costs. Enhanced activation, rather than inhibition, drives task selection during dual-task processing.

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.8K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • The psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm measures cognitive load during dual-task performance.
  • Task switching literature primarily focuses on costs within individual tasks, not between task pairs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate global task-pair switching costs using a novel paradigm.
  • To determine if task-pair activation is modulated by inhibitory control or enhanced activation.

Main Methods:

  • Combined the PRP paradigm with a task-pair switching logic.
  • Employed conceptually and physically overlapping responses for Task 1 (T1) and Task 2 (T2).
  • Analyzed performance costs associated with task-pair repetitions versus switches at different sequence lags (n-1 and n-2).

Main Results:

  • Observed the classic PRP effect (worse performance at short SOAs).
  • Found significant n-1 task-pair switch costs, indicating task-pair activation.
  • Demonstrated an n-2 task-pair repetition benefit, suggesting enhanced activation over inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • Task-pair activation is a key factor in dual-task performance.
  • Enhanced activation, not inhibition, appears to be the primary selection mechanism at the global task-pair level.
  • The findings challenge traditional views of inhibitory control in task switching.