Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
Response to Selection in Finite Locus Models with Nonadditive Effects.
Hadi Esfandyari1, Mark Henryon2,3, Peer Berg1,4
1Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Directional selection decreases additive genetic variance (VA), even with nonadditive genetic effects. While nonadditive effects influence long-term gains, additive gene action yields the highest response. BLUP-EBV improves selection outcomes over phenotypic selection.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative genetics
- Population genetics
- Animal breeding
Background:
- Quantitative-genetic theory predicts decreased additive genetic variation under directional selection.
- Nonadditive genetic effects (dominance, epistasis) may sustain or increase additive variance.
- Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing genetic gain in breeding programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if finite-locus models with additive and nonadditive genetic effects maintain more additive genetic variance (VA) than models with only additive effects.
- To evaluate if models including nonadditive effects achieve larger medium- to long-term genetic gains under truncation selection.
- To compare the efficacy of BLUP-EBV versus phenotypic selection in different genetic models.
Main Methods:
- Simulated four genetic models with additive, dominance, and additive-by-additive epistatic effects.
- Used a simulated genome with 25 chromosomes and 100 bi-allelic QTL.
- Conducted 100 generations of directional truncation selection on a trait with heritability (h2) of 0.1, using either phenotypic values or BLUP-EBV.
Main Results:
- Additive genetic variance (VA) decreased with directional truncation selection, irrespective of nonadditive effects.
- Nonadditive effects had minimal impact on changes in VA but influenced long-term selection response.
- Additive gene action resulted in the highest response among the simulated genetic models.
- BLUP-EBV led to greater fixation of alleles and higher response compared to phenotypic selection across all models.
Conclusions:
- The presence of nonadditive genetic effects had little impact on the decrease of additive variance under directional selection in the simulated scenarios.
- Directional selection consistently reduces additive genetic variance.
- BLUP-EBV is a more effective selection strategy than phenotypic selection for maximizing genetic gain and allele fixation.
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
Types of Selection
Limits to Natural Selection
Inclusive Fitness
Genetic Drift
Hardy-Weinberg Principle

