Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Transient Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Hirotoshi Ichibori1, Koji Fukuzawa1,2, Kunihiko Kiuchi1,2

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Insights

Nearly one-third of cardiac resynchronization therapy responders experienced transient left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction. These patients, particularly those with chronic atrial fibrillation, face poorer long-term outcomes and increased heart failure hospitalizations.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Heart Failure Management
  • Medical Device Therapy

Background:

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is typically assessed by left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) changes at 6 months.
  • Long-term LVESV regression beyond 6 months after CRT is not well-described.
  • Understanding sustained CRT response is crucial for patient prognosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the proportion of CRT responders with transient LVESV reduction.
  • To identify predictors of transient LVESV response to CRT.
  • To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of transient versus sustained CRT responders.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 104 consecutive CRT patients.
  • Responder definition: ≥15% relative reduction in LVESV at 6 months post-CRT.
  • Transient responder definition: <15% LVESV reduction at 2 years or cardiac death within 24 months.

Main Results:

  • 16 out of 56 (29%) responders were classified as transient responders.
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation (OR=19.2) and amiodarone use (OR=60.9) independently predicted transient responses.
  • Transient responders had significantly higher heart failure hospitalizations (P<0.001) and a trend towards higher all-cause mortality (P=0.093) over 7.6 years.

Conclusions:

  • Approximately one-third of CRT responders exhibit transient LVESV reduction.
  • Transient responders have significantly worse long-term clinical outcomes, including heart failure hospitalizations.
  • Patients with chronic atrial fibrillation require close monitoring to maintain LVESV reduction post-CRT.
Abstract