Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single arch stabilization devices for segmental orthognathic surgery.

R A Bays, R J Fonseca, T A Turvey

    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology
    |October 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Orbital apex disorders: a case series.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2016
    Same author

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting following orthognathic surgery.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2015
    Same author

    Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2013
    Same author

    Biodegradable fixation for craniomaxillofacial surgery: a 10-year experience involving 761 operations and 745 patients.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2010
    Same author

    Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

    Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2010
    Same author

    Long-term stability of adolescent versus adult surgery for treatment of mandibular deficiency.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2010
    Same journal

    The relation of the physical character of the diet to the health of the periodontal tissues; a critical review of the literature.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    Same journal

    Psychosomatic factors in the etiology of periodontal disease; a critical review of the literature.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    Same journal

    Bacteriologic investigations of the oral spirochetal flora in ulcerative stomatitis (Vincent's infection).

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    Same journal

    The nature and significance of infection in periodontal disease.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    Same journal

    Histopathology of periodontal diseases.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    Same journal

    Metastasis of chondromyxosarcoma to the jaw and tooth.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·2010
    See all related articles

    Single arch stabilization of segmental osteotomies offers benefits over traditional methods by improving patient comfort and function. Modified arch bars serve as effective alternatives to orthodontic appliances for this purpose.

    Area of Science:

    • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    • Orthodontics
    • Biomaterials

    Background:

    • Segmental osteotomies require stable fixation for optimal healing and functional outcomes.
    • Traditional intermaxillary fixation presents challenges in patient comfort, hygiene, and communication.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate methods for single arch stabilization of segmental osteotomies.
    • To identify alternatives to intermaxillary fixation that enhance patient outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current stabilization techniques including orthodontic appliances, modified arch bars, and cast splints.
    • Discussion of adjunctive devices like palatal plates, lingual plates, and interocclusal wafers.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Orthodontic appliances with stabilizing arch wires are preferred when available.
  • Modified arch bars provide a viable alternative, offering similar benefits to orthodontic appliances.
  • Cast splints are effective but limited by cost and laboratory requirements.
  • Conclusions:

    • Single arch stabilization enhances patient comfort, oral hygiene, and function post-segmental osteotomy.
    • Modified arch bars represent a practical and effective alternative for segmental stabilization.
    • Adjunctive devices can further support various stabilization systems.