Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary and secondary prevention: indications and outcomes
Justin M Pick1, Anjan S Batra1
1Children's Hospital of Orange County,University of California Irvine,Irvine, California,United States of America.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduce sudden cardiac death in children. This review clarifies their use for primary and secondary prevention, aiding shared decision-making by detailing risks and benefits.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in pediatric populations.
- There has been a notable shift towards primary prevention (prophylactic placement) over secondary prevention (post-event placement) in the last two decades.
- Understanding specific indications for ICDs in children is critical due to potential adverse effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current indications for ICD implantation in children for both primary and secondary prevention of SCD.
- To analyze the risks and benefits associated with ICD implantation in pediatric patients.
- To support informed shared decision-making among healthcare providers, patients, and families regarding ICD therapy.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature review of studies on pediatric ICD implantation.
- Analysis of trends in primary versus secondary prevention strategies.
- Evaluation of reported adverse events and hardware-related complications.
Main Results:
- ICDs are effective in reducing SCD rates in children.
- Primary prevention indications are increasingly utilized, though require careful risk assessment.
- High rates of adverse effects, including inappropriate shocks and re-interventions, are associated with ICDs, particularly in cases with marginal indications.
Conclusions:
- ICD implantation indications in children are diverse and depend on underlying cardiac pathology.
- Careful consideration of risks versus benefits is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
- Enhanced shared decision-making is vital for appropriate ICD use in pediatric SCD prevention.
Abstract:
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators effectively reduce the rate of sudden cardiac death in children. Significant efforts have been made to better characterise the indications for their placement, and over the past two decades there has been a shift in their use from secondary to primary prevention. Primary prevention includes placement in patients thought to be at high risk of sudden cardiac death before the patient experiences any event. Secondary prevention includes placement after a high-risk event including sustained ventricular tachycardia or resuscitated cardiac arrest. Although liberal device implantation may be appealing even in patients having marginal indications, studies have shown high rates of adverse effects including inappropriate device discharges and the need for re-intervention because of hardware malfunction. The indications for placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, whether for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, vary based on cardiac pathology. This review will assist the provider in understanding the risks and benefits of device implantation in order to enhance the shared decision-making capacity of patients, families, and providers.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

