Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predictive Processing Over the Course of Aging: Multiple Timescales of Effective Connectivity.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same author

Mismatch negativity: A systematic review of the spatiotemporal pattern of adaptation and prediction error in MMN.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same author

Auditory Inference and Long-Term Modulation of Excitation and Inhibition.

Psychophysiology·2025

Same author

Temporal Trajectories of Mismatch Negativity Reveal Dynamics of Auditory Perceptual Learning.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025

Same author

From Näätänen to now: Moving the Mismatch Negativity into the Next 50 Years.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2024

Same author

Contextualised Processing of Stimuli Modulates Auditory Mismatch Responses in the Rat.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Initial uncertainty impacts statistical learning in sound sequence processing.

Juanita Todd¹, Alexander Provost¹, Lisa Whitson¹

¹School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Journal of Physiology, Paris

|January 16, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Early learning significantly impacts how the brain processes new sounds. Initial exposure to predictable or unpredictable auditory patterns influences subsequent sound relevance filtering, even during incidental learning.

Keywords:

Auditory evoked potentials Mismatch negativity Predictive coding Primacy bias Sequential learning

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Auditory Perception
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

The auditory system forms prediction models based on regular sound patterns.
Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) reflect the strength of these prediction models.
Incidental learning can occur even when attention is directed elsewhere.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the lasting impact of initial auditory learning on subsequent experience.
To determine how predictability influences early relevance-filtering processes.
To examine the role of probability and predictability in updating auditory prediction models.

Main Methods:

Two studies exposed participants to auditory sequences with local and longer-term patterns.
Deviating tones (rare or common) were introduced into the sound sequences.
Auditory evoked potentials were measured while participants focused on a movie.

Main Results:

Auditory evoked potentials showed lasting modulatory influences based on initial tone predictability.
The initial status of a tone (rare vs. common) affected how prediction models were updated.
These effects were observed for both common and rare tone occurrences.

Conclusions:

Initial learning profoundly influences how the brain weights subsequent auditory experiences.
Predictability, rather than raw probability, may trigger value-based learning modulations.
These findings suggest that uncertainty drives learning even in task-irrelevant contexts.