Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical glove perforation in dermatologic surgery.

D J Gross1, Y Jamison, K Martin

  • 1Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Eleven percent of surgical gloves had unnoticed perforations, increasing infection risk for patients undergoing dermatologic surgery. Surgeons must be aware of this risk, especially when operating on patients with infectious diseases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Morphological study of the anatomical variations of anterior belly of digastric muscle in Brazilian cadavers.

Folia morphologica·2022
Same author

In Vivo Pulp Temperature Changes During Class V Cavity Preparation and Resin Composite Restoration in Premolars.

Operative dentistry·2021
Same author

Obesity and surgical complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy: An observation study utilizing ACS NSQIP.

American journal of surgery·2019
Same author

Efficacy of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome: final overall survival from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 RADIANT-2 study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2019
Same author

Outcomes in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies: challenging preconceived notions.

The Journal of surgical research·2018
Same author

Hepatic intra-arterial therapies in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: lessons from clinical practice.

Endocrine·2018

Area of Science:

  • Dermatologic Surgery
  • Infectious Disease Transmission
  • Surgical Safety

Background:

  • Sterile surgical gloves are critical barriers in preventing pathogen transmission during dermatologic surgery.
  • Glove integrity is essential for maintaining aseptic technique and patient safety.
  • Previous studies have highlighted the potential for glove perforations, but data specific to dermatologic surgery settings is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of sterile surgical glove perforations in dermatologic surgery clinics.
  • To assess the awareness of glove perforations among surgical staff during procedures.
  • To evaluate the implications of undetected glove perforations for patient safety, particularly in the context of infectious diseases.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A prospective study was conducted involving the collection and examination of 240 pairs of sterile surgical gloves from dermatologic surgery clinics.
  • Gloves were inspected for perforations after surgical procedures.
  • Data on the type of glove (operator/assistant, dominant/non-dominant hand) and wearer awareness of perforations were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant incidence of glove perforations was observed, with 11.7% (28/240) of glove pairs found to be perforated.
    • The majority of these perforations (82.9%) were unrecognized by the surgical team during the procedure.
    • Perforations occurred equally in gloves worn by operators and assistants, and were more frequent in dominant-handed gloves.

    Conclusions:

    • The high rate of undetected glove perforations in dermatologic surgery poses a substantial risk for pathogen transmission.
    • Dermatologic surgeons must consider the potential for unrecognized glove compromise when managing patients, especially those with infectious diseases.
    • Enhanced vigilance and potentially improved glove materials or techniques are warranted to mitigate this risk.