Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.3K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.3K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.1K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

426
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
426
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

308
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
308
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

326
Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
326
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

299
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
299

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A human-specific microRNA controls the timing of excitatory synaptogenesis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Response to comment on: Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.

PLoS pathogens·2026
Same author

Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.

PLoS pathogens·2025
Same author

lncreased risk of slippage upon disengagement of the mitotic checkpoint.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

miR-708-5p is elevated in bipolar patients and can induce mood disorder-associated behavior in mice.

EMBO reports·2025
Same author

Evolutionary adaptation to hyperstable microtubules selectively targets tubulins and is empowered by the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Cell reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Prospects and problems for standardizing model validation in systems biology.

Fridolin Gross1, Miles MacLeod2

  • 1Institute for Philosophy, University of Kassel, Nora-Platiel-Strasse 1, 34127 Kassel, Germany.

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
|January 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Establishing validation standards for computational models in systems biology is complex. While beneficial for collaboration and medical applications, current practices and data limitations pose challenges, suggesting a cautious approach to standardization.

Keywords:
Model selectionModelingStandardizationSystems biologyValidation

More Related Videos

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.9K
Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
08:31

Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions

Published on: December 1, 2020

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.9K
Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
08:31

Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions

Published on: December 1, 2020

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Computational Modeling
  • Scientific Validation

Background:

  • Lack of standardized criteria for assessing computational model validity in systems biology.
  • Current modeling practices are diverse, serving various heuristic purposes that may not require strict validation.
  • Predictively valid models are a goal, but practical implementation faces hurdles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the feasibility and desirability of implementing validation standards for systems biology models.
  • To explore the benefits and challenges associated with standardization.
  • To identify universal technical validation issues in computational modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual discussion and analysis of current practices in systems biology modeling.
  • Evaluation of the potential impact of validation standards on scientific communication and application.
  • Identification of technical obstacles related to data quality and model diversity.

Main Results:

  • Implementing strict validation standards faces significant technical obstacles, primarily due to empirical data quality.
  • Diverse modeling purposes and practices mean a one-size-fits-all validation standard may not be universally applicable or desirable.
  • Standardization efforts, even if informal, can improve understanding of modeling practices and technical challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Rigorous standardization for systems biology models appears premature due to current limitations.
  • A cautious approach to standardization is recommended, focusing on identifying common technical validation issues.
  • Informal guidelines could aid modelers in addressing validation challenges across different contexts.