Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Evaluation of Capnography Sampling Line Compatibility and Accuracy when Used with a Portable Capnography Monitor
Published on: September 29, 2020
Accuracy of Oxygen Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Elimination Measurements in 2 Breath-by-Breath Devices
Craig D Smallwood1,2, John N Kheir3, Brian K Walsh4,2
1Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine craig.smallwood@childrens.harvard.edu.
Insights
Accurate measurement of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide elimination is crucial for pediatric patients. The E-sCAiOVX module shows acceptable accuracy for these measurements in children weighing 5-16 kg.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care
- Respiratory physiology
- Medical device evaluation
Background:
- Accurate quantification of oxygen consumption (V̇O) and carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO) is vital for assessing nutritional and hemodynamic status in patients.
- Limited availability of accurate devices for measuring these parameters in pediatric populations necessitates evaluation of existing technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy and agreement of two commercial respiratory modules for measuring V̇O and V̇CO in a pediatric in vitro model.
- To determine the clinical applicability of these devices for pediatric patient monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Huszczuk simulation model to generate controlled V̇O and V̇CO values (20-100 mL/min) representative of pediatric patients.
- Evaluated two FDA-cleared respiratory modules: E-COVX and E-sCAiOVX-00.
- Employed Bland-Altman analysis to quantify bias and limits of agreement for each device against simulated gas exchange values.
Main Results:
- The E-COVX module exhibited significant bias, with mean percentage errors of -26.3% for V̇O and -39.3% for V̇CO, deemed clinically unacceptable.
- The E-sCAiOVX-00 module demonstrated acceptable accuracy, showing a mean bias of -0.5% for V̇O and -6.0% for V̇CO.
- The E-sCAiOVX-00 module's acceptable performance was observed for V̇O and V̇CO ranges of 40-100 mL/min, corresponding to pediatric patients weighing approximately 5-16 kg.
Conclusions:
- The E-COVX module is not recommended for use in pediatric patients due to unacceptable measurement bias.
- The E-sCAiOVX module provides clinically acceptable accuracy for V̇O and V̇CO measurements in pediatric patients within the 5-16 kg weight range.
- This study validates the E-sCAiOVX module as a reliable tool for respiratory gas exchange monitoring in specific pediatric populations.
Background:
Although accurate quantification of oxygen consumption (V̇O ) and carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO ) provides important insights into a patient's nutritional and hemodynamic status, few devices exist to accurately measure these parameters in children. Therefore, we assessed the accuracy and agreement of 2 devices currently on the market using a pediatric in vitro model of gas exchange.
Methods:
We utilized a Huszczuk simulation model, which simulates oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using gas dilution, to examine the accuracy of two FDA-cleared respiratory modules (E-COVX and E-sCAiOVX-00). V̇O and V̇CO were set at 20, 40, 60, and 100 mL/min, ranges typical for infant and pediatric patients. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate the bias and limits of agreement of each device relative to simulated values for V̇O and V̇CO .
Results:
The E-COVX mean percentage bias (limits of agreement) was -26.3% (-36.1 to -16.6%) and -39.3% (-47.5 to -31.1%) for V̇O and V̇CO , respectively. The mean bias (limits of agreement) for the E-aCAiOVX-00 was -0.5% (-13.3 to 12.3%) and -6.0% (-13.8 to 1.7%) for V̇O and V̇CO , respectively.
Conclusions:
The E-COVX demonstrated bias and limits of agreement that were not clinically acceptable; therefore, application of this module to pediatric patients would not be recommended. The new module, E-sCAiOVX, demonstrated acceptable bias and limits of agreement for the V̇O and V̇CO in the range 40-100 mL/min (which corresponds to patients in the range of ∼5-16 kg).
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

