Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Web-Based Workflow for Selecting Gene- and Tissue-Specific Enhancers
Published on: July 18, 2025
eRFSVM: a hybrid classifier to predict enhancers-integrating random forests with support vector machines
Fang Huang1, Jiawei Shen1, Qingli Guo1
1Bio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Ministry of Education) and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030 People's Republic of China.
Background:
Enhancers are tissue specific distal regulation elements, playing vital roles in gene regulation and expression. The prediction and identification of enhancers are important but challenging issues for bioinformatics studies. Existing computational methods, mostly single classifiers, can only predict the transcriptional coactivator EP300 based enhancers and show low generalization performance.
Results:
We built a hybrid classifier called eRFSVM in this study, using random forests as a base classifier, and support vector machines as a main classifier. eRFSVM integrated two components as eRFSVM-ENCODE and eRFSVM-FANTOM5 with diverse features and labels. The base classifier trained datasets from a single tissue or cell with random forests. The main classifier made the final decision by support vector machines algorithm, with the predicting results of base classifiers as inputs. For eRFSVM-ENCODE, we trained datasets from cell lines including Gm12878, Hep, H1-hesc and Huvec, using ChIP-Seq datasets as features and EP300 based enhancers as labels. We tested eRFSVM-ENCODE on K562 dataset, and resulted in a predicting precision of 83.69 %, which was much better than existing classifiers. For eRFSVM-FANTOM5, with enhancers identified by RNA in FANTOM5 project as labels, the precision, recall, F-score and accuracy were 86.17 %, 36.06 %, 50.84 % and 93.38 % using eRFSVM, increasing 23.24 % (69.92 %), 97.05 % (18.30 %), 76.90 % (28.74 %), 4.69 % (89.20 %) than the existing algorithm, respectively.
Conclusions:
All these results demonstrated that eRFSVM was a better classifier in predicting both EP300 based and FAMTOM5 RNAs based enhancers.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Signals
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Hybridoma Technology
Hybridoma Selection
Commonly used fusion techniques — electroporation,...