Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Evaluation of Structural Progression in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy
Thomas P Mast1, Cynthia A James2, Hugh Calkins2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Insights
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) shows progressive structural changes, with right ventricular dysfunction linked to depolarization abnormalities and left ventricular issues tied to genetic factors. This variability impacts disease management and future therapeutic strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is characterized by arrhythmias, but objective data on structural progression are limited.
- Understanding the structural changes and their determinants is crucial for managing ARVD/C.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify structural progression in ARVD/C.
- To identify factors influencing structural progression.
- To explore the relationship between structural changes and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of echocardiograms from 85 ARVD/C patients.
- Comparison of baseline and follow-up ventricular dimensions and systolic function (RV outflow tract, RV fractional area change, LV ejection fraction).
- Multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of structural progression.
Main Results:
- Significant increases in right ventricular (RV) size and decreases in RV systolic function (RV-FAC) and left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF) were observed over a mean follow-up of 6.4 years.
- RV progression correlated with baseline depolarization criteria; LV progression was associated with phospholamban (PLN) mutations.
- No association was found between structural progression and new ECG Task Force Criteria (TFC).
Conclusions:
- ARVD/C involves progressive structural dysfunction with significant inter-individual variability.
- RV progression is linked to electrical abnormalities, while LV progression is influenced by genetic background.
- These findings inform future clinical trials targeting structural progression in ARVD/C.
Importance:
Considerable research has described the arrhythmic course of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). However, objective data characterizing structural progression, such as ventricular enlargement and cardiac dysfunction, in ARVD/C are relatively scarce.
Objectives:
To define the extent of structural progression, identify determinants of structural progression, and determine the association between structural progression and electrocardiographic (ECG) changes in patients with ARVD/C.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
In this cohort study, first- and last-available echocardiograms of 85 patients with ARVD/C fulfilling 2010 Task Force diagnostic criteria (TFC) from a transatlantic ARVD/C registry were retrospectively compared to assess structural disease progression. Right ventricular (RV) size and systolic function between baseline and last follow-up were compared. The RV size was determined by RV outflow tract dimension, and RV and left ventricular (LV) systolic function were determined by RV fractional area change (RV-FAC) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study associations between baseline characteristics and the occurrence of structural progression.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The main outcome was the change in variables indicating structural progression. Secondary outcomes were the correlation with electrical progression and identification of the association between baseline characteristics and occurence structural progression.
Results:
Among the 85 patients with ARVD/C, mean (SD) age at baseline was 42.8 (14.4) years and 47 (55%) were men. After a mean (SD) follow-up of 6.4 (2.5) years, RV outflow tract dimension increased from 35 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 31 to 39) to 37 mm (IQR, 33 to 41) (P < .001), RV-FAC decreased from 39% (IQR, 33% to 44%) to 34% (IQR, 24% to 42%) (P < .001) (rate -3.3% per 5 years; IQR, -8.9% to 1.2%), indicating large interpatient variability. The LVEF decreased from 55% (IQR, 52% to 60%) to 54% (IQR, 49% to 57%) (P = .001) (rate, -0.2% per 5 years; IQR, -6.5% to 1.7%). Forty examinations were reanalyzed to establish the measurement error. Patients exceeding the measurement error by ±2 SDs were identified with significant progressive disease for RV, with a decrease in RV-FAC greater than 10% (n = 21) and, for LV, a decrease in LVEF greater than 7% (n = 23). Progression of RV disease was associated with depolarization criteria at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 9.0; 95% CI, 1.1-74.2; P = .04), whereas progression of LV disease was associated with phospholamban (PLN) mutation (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.1-37.2; P = .003). There was no association between progressive RV/LV structural disease and newly developed ECG TFC.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Structural dysfunction in ARVD/C is progressive with substantial interpatient variability. Significant structural RV progression was associated with prior depolarization abnormalities, whereas LV progression is modified by genetic background. Structural progression was not associated with development of new ECG TFC. The results of this study pave the way for designing and launching trials aimed at reducing structural progression in patients with ARVD/C.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

