[Doppler techniques in the detection of valvular regurgitation: their value and limitations]

To evaluate the clinical value of various Doppler techniques in detecting valvular regurgitation, we compared the sensitivity, timing and duration of regurgitation, and the peak velocity of regurgitant signals among conventional pulsed Doppler, color Doppler, continuous wave Doppler and HPRF Doppler echocardiography. 1. Sensitivity of Doppler techniques in detecting mitral regurgitation: Among fifty patients with mitral regurgitation confirmed by left ventriculography, mitral regurgitation was detected in 48 (96%) using color Doppler and pulsed Doppler echocardiography; in 41 (82%) by HPRF Doppler; and in 37 (74%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In 103 consecutive normal volunteers, mitral regurgitant signals were detected in 46 (45%) by color Doppler, in 39 (38%) by pulsed Doppler, in 16 (16%) by HPRF Doppler, and in 8 (8%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. 2. Timing and duration of regurgitant signals: To assess the timing and duration of regurgitant signals, 43 patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during systole or diastole were studied using M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Using the latter method, regurgitant signals throughout systole and the isovolumic relaxation period could be demonstrated in all but four patients who had regurgitant signals of short duration during systole, but suggesting mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. In all patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during diastole, aortic or pulmonary regurgitant signals throughout diastole could be demonstrated with M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Thus, this technique is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting accurate timing and duration of valvular regurgitation. 3. Peak velocity of regurgitant flow: To compare the peak velocity of regurgitant flow by continuous wave Doppler and by HPRF Doppler echocardiography, 20 patients with mitral regurgitation and 22 patients with tricuspid regurgitation were examined using the both methods. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography correlated well (r = 0.96) with that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. However, in patients with mild mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography was higher than that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity had a close correlation (r = 0.99) with the both techniques. In patients with mild tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity was higher by HPRF than by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In conclusion, color or pulsed Doppler echocardiography should be used for detecting valvular regurgitation. M-mode color Doppler echocardiography is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting timing and duration of valvular regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)