Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
The DNA target determines the dimerization partner selected by bHLHZ-like hybrid proteins AhRJun and ArntFos
Ichiro Inamoto1, Gang Chen1, Jumi A Shin1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6. jumi.shin@utoronto.ca.
Abstract:
The molecular basis of protein-partner selection and DNA binding of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) superfamilies of dimeric transcription factors is fundamental toward understanding gene regulation. Because these families share structural similarities, we swapped the bHLH and leucine zipper (LZ) modules between families to uncover how individual modules influence protein-partnering and protein:DNA complexation. We previously described ArntFos, a bHLHZ-like hybrid of the bHLH domain from the bHLH/PAS protein Arnt and LZ from the bZIP protein c-Fos, binding to the Arnt E-box site (TCACGTGA) as a homodimer. Herein, we describe a heterodimer between ArntFos and AhRJun, a hybrid of the bHLH domain from AhR and LZ of JunD. We designed AhRJun and ArntFos to heterodimerize, given the strong interaction between native AhR/Arnt and Jun/Fos, but the hybrids showed no preference for hetero- or homo-dimerization in Y2H assays. However, adding a specific DNA target drove the formation of a single dimeric protein species over others. EMSA showed that the AhRJun/ArntFos heterodimer binds to the cognate DNA site XRE1 (TTGCGTG) with Kd = 337 nM. Unexpectedly, the palindromic Arnt E-box drove the binding of the AhRJun/ArntFos heterodimer (Kd = 276 nM)-not the ArntFos homodimer-that binds to the Arnt E-box. However, the dimerization preference switched to the ArntFos homodimer when the variant Max E-box (CCACGTGG) was used. We conclude that the DNA sites themselves are the primary determinants of dimerization specificity for AhRJun and ArntFos, not the JunD and c-Fos LZs, a result that sheds light on the dynamics of protein/protein and protein:DNA interactions and the structural modularity of bHLH and bZIP proteins.
More Related Videos
06:38High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
Published on: February 7, 2019
12:24DNA-affinity-purified Chip DAP-chip Method to Determine Gene Targets for Bacterial Two component Regulatory Systems
Published on: July 21, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These...
Master Transcription Regulators
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...