Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Tail Vein Transection Bleeding Model in Fully Anesthetized Hemophilia A Mice
Published on: September 30, 2021
Adherence to Prophylaxis in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Haemophilia: A Quantitative Study with Patients
Sandra B van Os1, Nick A Troop1, Keith R Sullivan1
1Psychology and Sport Sciences Department, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Insights
Adherence to haemophilia prophylaxis is generally good among young people in the UK. Psychosocial factors like perceived need for treatment and social support significantly influence adherence, guiding future interventions.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Haemophilia is a severe inherited bleeding disorder requiring regular factor concentrate prophylaxis.
- Adherence to weekly prophylactic treatment is crucial for managing bleeds and improving quality of life in young people.
- Existing adherence data for young haemophilia patients is limited and often based on estimations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate self-reported adherence to haemophilia prophylaxis in young individuals.
- To identify psychosocial predictors associated with treatment adherence.
- To determine the correlation between non-adherence and clinical outcomes like bleeds and hospital visits.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire-based study involving 91 young people with haemophilia across 13 UK centers.
- Assessment of adherence using VERITAS-Pro, alongside psychosocial factors (illness perceptions, self-efficacy, social support, etc.).
- Collection of clinical data on bleeds and hospital visits from medical records.
Main Results:
- Only 18% of participants with complete data exhibited non-adherence.
- Psychosocial predictors varied for intentional (skipping) versus unintentional (forgetting) non-adherence.
- Higher adherence correlated with greater perceived need for prophylaxis, positive outcome expectations, strong social support, and emotional impact of haemophilia.
Conclusions:
- Self-reported adherence to haemophilia prophylaxis is generally good in young people.
- Assessing illness beliefs, treatment perceptions, social support, and outcome expectations can identify at-risk individuals.
- Interventions should focus on enhancing social support, addressing concerns, reinforcing prophylaxis necessity, and improving outcome expectations.
Introduction:
haemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in one of the blood coagulation factors. For people affected by severe haemophilia, the deficiency can cause spontaneous internal bleeding. Most young people with severe haemophilia in the UK follow a preventative treatment regimen (prophylaxis) consisting of several intravenous injections of factor concentrate each week. There is good evidence that prophylaxis reduces bleeds whilst also improving quality of life. However, levels of adherence among young people with haemophilia reported in the existing literature vary widely and are predominately based on estimations made by healthcare professionals and parents. Additionally, drivers of (non)adherence among young people specifically have not been evidenced.
Aim:
to assess self-reported adherence among young people with haemophilia, provide evidence of psychosocial predictors of adherence, and to establish the associations between non-adherence and number of bleeds and hospital visits.
Methods:
91 participants were recruited during outpatient appointments in 13 haemophilia centres across England and Wales, and invited to complete a questionnaire assessing self-reported adherence (VERITAS-Pro), Haemophilia-related pain and impact of pain, Illness Perceptions, Beliefs about Medications, Self-efficacy, Outcome expectations, Positive and Negative Affect, and Social support. Number of hospital visits and bleeds during the previous six months were collected from medical files.
Results:
Of 78 participants with complete data, just 18% had scores indicating non-adherence. Psychosocial predictors differed between intentional (skipping) and un-intentional (forgetting) non-adherence. Overall, however, better adherence was reported where participants perceived the need for prophylaxis was greater than their concern over taking it as well as having a positive expectancy of its effectiveness, good social support and a stronger emotional reaction to having haemophilia.
Conclusion:
The findings indicate that adherence is generally good, and that assessing illness and treatment beliefs, social support and outcome expectations may play a valuable role in identifying which individuals are at risk of non-adherence. Interventions aimed at improving adherence should particularly consider improving social support, reducing patients' concerns about prophylaxis, increasing their belief in the necessity of prophylaxis, and increasing positive outcome expectations.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...

