Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

07:11
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
6.9K
SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract
L Gupta1, V Cvintal2, R Delvadia3
1George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Eye (London, England)
|January 21, 2017
Summary
The new Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test effectively measures central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in cataract patients, similar to the Pelli- Robson (PR) test, and is not influenced by literacy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Visual Science
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cataract significantly impacts visual function, including contrast sensitivity.
- Accurate assessment of contrast sensitivity is crucial for evaluating visual impairment in cataract patients.
- Existing tests like the Pelli- Robson (PR) primarily assess central vision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the internet-based Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test.
- To compare SPARCS's ability to assess central and peripheral contrast sensitivity against the Pelli- Robson (PR) test.
- To determine the test-retest reliability of the SPARCS test in cataract subjects and controls.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, cross-sectional study involving cataract subjects and age-matched controls.
- Contrast sensitivity was measured twice for each eye using both SPARCS and PR tests in a randomized order.
- SPARCS assessed central and four peripheral quadrants; PR assessed central vision only.
Main Results:
- Both SPARCS and PR tests showed significantly reduced contrast sensitivity in cataract subjects compared to controls (P=0.001 for SPARCS central, P<0.001 for PR).
- Test-retest reliability was acceptable for both tests, with ICC values of 0.75 for PR and 0.61 for SPARCS.
- SPARCS demonstrated good agreement with PR in detecting the effect of cataract on central contrast sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Both the SPARCS and PR tests effectively demonstrate the negative impact of cataracts on contrast sensitivity.
- The SPARCS test provides a comprehensive assessment by measuring both central and peripheral contrast sensitivity.
- SPARCS offers an advantage due to its internet-based platform and independence from literacy, enhancing accessibility.

