Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

07:25
An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
Published on: February 12, 2018
7.3K
Evaluation of Kinect 3D Sensor for Healthcare Imaging
Stefanie T L Pöhlmann1, Elaine F Harkness1, Christopher J Taylor1
1Centre for Imaging Sciences, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT UK.
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
|January 24, 2017
Summary
Microsoft Kinect sensors offer cost-effective 3D healthcare imaging. Kinect I excels at short-range imaging, while Kinect II is better for curved surfaces, both showing adequate performance for various healthcare applications.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging Technology
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Microsoft Kinect, initially a gaming sensor, is increasingly explored for healthcare imaging due to its cost-effectiveness and safety.
- Existing research reviews Kinect's applications in health monitoring, screening, rehabilitation, and assistive systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the suitability of Microsoft Kinect sensors for healthcare imaging applications.
- To compare the performance of Kinect I and Kinect II in terms of accuracy, precision, and resolution for healthcare scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated Kinect I (structured light) and Kinect II (time-of-flight) using cardboard models of varying skin colors.
- Measured performance at distances from 0.5 to 1.2 m and angles up to 75°.
- Assessed accuracy, precision, and resolution of the generated 3D images.
Main Results:
- Both Kinect I and Kinect II demonstrated high accuracy (<2 mm) and precision (<2 mm error).
- Kinect I achieved higher resolution (390 points/cm²) and is suitable for shorter distances.
- Kinect II offered superior precision and is better for imaging structures angled over 60°, like curved surfaces.
Conclusions:
- Microsoft Kinect sensors provide adequate performance for diverse healthcare imaging tasks, despite not being medical devices.
- Kinect I is recommended for short-range imaging, while Kinect II is preferred for imaging highly curved anatomical regions (e.g., face, breast).
- Object color can impact measurement range and precision, requiring consideration in application design.

