Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty after head and inlay revision surgery
Lorenz Pisecky1, Günter Hipmair1, Bernhard Schauer1
1Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz, Department for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4021 Linz, Austria.
Insights
Revision surgery for hip replacements may reduce osteolysis (bone loss) around the femoral component. Patients with larger radiolucent zones showed the most significant improvement after head and inlay replacement.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Radiology
Background:
- Osteolysis, or bone loss, is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), often attributed to wear debris.
- Revision surgery involving the femoral head and acetabular liner is a potential treatment to address osteolysis.
- Identifying which patients benefit most from such interventions is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of head and acetabular liner revision surgery on osteolytic zones around the femoral component in THA.
- To determine if this revision surgery can reduce the size of these osteolytic areas.
- To identify patient characteristics that predict a positive response to revision surgery.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 47 patients (51 hips) who underwent THA head and inlay revision surgery between 1999 and 2011.
- Analysis of pre-surgical and follow-up anterior-posterior X-rays to measure the size of radiolucent areas (osteolytic zones).
- Comparison of osteolytic zone sizes before and after revision surgery, with stratification based on initial size and implant materials.
Main Results:
- The mean size of radiolucent areas was 147 sq.mm pre-surgery and 145 sq.mm at a mean follow-up of 39.2 months.
- In cases with radiolucent zones exceeding 100 sq.mm, an average reduction of 28% was observed in 18 out of 29 instances.
- Overall improvement in osteolytic zones was noted in 29 out of 51 hips, with stabilization in one case.
Conclusions:
- Head and acetabular liner revision surgery can lead to a reduction in osteolytic zones around the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
- Patients presenting with larger initial radiolucent areas appear to benefit most from this revision procedure.
- This intervention may be a viable option for managing osteolysis in select THA patients.
Abstract:
Wear debris seems to be the most likely reason for osteolysis in THA. The aim was to show the influence of head and acetabular liner revision surgery on osteolytic zones around the femoral component. Can head and inlay revision surgery reduce the size of the osteolytic zones around the femoral component? Which patients could benefit? 47 patients (51 hips), who had undergone THA head and inlay revision surgery between 1999 and 2011, were reviewed. The mean lifetime for the prosthesis was 15.1 years (8-26, standard deviation 4.5) and the mean follow-up for head and inlay was 39.2 months (12-113, standard deviation 30). The heads used in revision surgery were made of metal (26) and ceramics (25). In 36 cases a ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene inlay was taken, in 15 cases a regular PE-inlay. We compared the pre-surgical and follow-up anterior-posterior X-rays. The mean size of radiolucent areas before revision surgery was 147 sq.mm (5-389 sq.mm, standard deviation 115). Thirty-nine months (12-113) after surgery, their mean size was 145 sq.mm (7-604 sq.mm, standard deviation 124). Radiolucent zones exceeding 100 sq.mm could be reduced by an average of 28% in 18 out of 29 cases. The results showed an improvement in 29 out of 51 cases and a stop of progress in one case. According to the findings there may be a benefit for patients with big radiolucent areas.
More Related Videos
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022