Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026

Same author

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal cortex, unlike occipital stimulation, does not disrupt exogenous attention.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Dynamic cortical routing mediates temporal attention.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Covert spatial attention is uniform across cardinal meridians despite differential adaptation.

Journal of vision·2026

Same author

Saccade direction modulates the temporal dynamics of presaccadic attention.

Journal of vision·2025

Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Retributive Sentiments Track Both Deterrent and Compensatory Concerns in a Small-Scale Society and a WEIRD Sample.

Psychological science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Attention Modifies Spatial Resolution According to Task Demands.

Antoine Barbot¹, Marisa Carrasco^1,2

¹1 Department of Psychology, New York University.

Psychological Science

|January 25, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Endogenous attention flexibly adjusts spatial resolution by modulating high-frequency information. This mechanism improves performance across different visual tasks and locations, unlike involuntary attention.

Keywords:

adaptation attention spatial frequency spatial resolution texture segmentation

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Area of Science:

Visual perception
Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

Visual attention influences spatial resolution, with involuntary attention improving performance at low-resolution areas and impairing at high-resolution areas.
Voluntary attention, however, enhances performance across all visual field eccentricities, suggesting a more adaptable mechanism.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the underlying mechanism of how voluntary (endogenous) attention benefits spatial resolution tasks.
To determine if endogenous attention can decrease spatial resolution to optimize performance.

Main Methods:

Utilized selective adaptation to spatial frequency in a texture-segmentation task.
Participants detected texture targets at various eccentricities after adapting to high or low spatial frequencies.

Main Results:

Spatial frequency adaptation modulated performance, consistent with changes in spatial resolution.
Adaptation to high spatial frequencies reduced the attentional benefit at central, high-resolution locations, indicating attention can decrease resolution.
Low spatial frequency adaptation did not show this effect.

Conclusions:

Endogenous attention benefits resolution tasks by flexibly adjusting spatial resolution.
This adjustment is achieved by modulating the contribution of high-frequency information based on task demands.
Attention can improve performance by decreasing, not just increasing, spatial resolution.