Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

347
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
347
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

342
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
342
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

511
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
511
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders: A scoping review.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes from the follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial investigating time-lapse embryo monitoring.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

The composition of commercially available human embryo culture media.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Local production of 17β-oestradiol in the endometrium during the implantation window: a pilot study.

Reproduction & fertility·2023
Same author

Reply: Artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and obstetric adverse outcomes: association or causation?

Human reproduction update·2023
Same author

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Human reproduction update·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

Equipoise and the RCT.

M Braakhekke1, F Mol2, S Mastenbroek2

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Room Q3-119, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands m.w.braakhekke@amc.nl.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|January 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) improve reproductive medicine decisions. Understanding equipoise ethically guides RCT design, preventing wasted research and ensuring meaningful trials for subfertile couples.

Keywords:
RCTbiological plausibilityclinical decision-makingequipoiseevidence-based medicinereproductive medicine

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Clinical Trial Ethics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Clinical decisions in reproductive medicine face significant uncertainty.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for reducing uncertainty and enhancing clinical decision-making.
  • The ethical principle of equipoise is fundamental to the justification of RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the core reasoning behind the ethical concept of equipoise.
  • To propose a framework for determining the ethical conditions for designing and conducting RCTs.
  • To improve the efficiency and meaningfulness of clinical research in reproductive medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the principle of equipoise in clinical research ethics.
  • Development of a logical framework for ethical RCT design in reproductive medicine.
  • Literature review on the application of equipoise in clinical trials.

Main Results:

  • Ethical equipoise requires a state of genuine uncertainty regarding the comparative therapeutic merits of the interventions under study.
  • A clear ethical framework can prevent the initiation of trials with a predetermined unfavorable outcome (a priori negative trials).
  • Meaningful RCTs, guided by ethical equipoise, are essential for advancing the care of subfertile couples.

Conclusions:

  • A rigorous understanding and application of equipoise are vital for ethical and efficient clinical research in reproductive medicine.
  • Ethical RCT design, informed by equipoise, minimizes research waste and maximizes the potential for clinically relevant findings.
  • This approach ensures that research directly contributes to safely and effectively assisting individuals and couples facing infertility.