Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Improved kidney function in patients who switch their protease inhibitor from atazanavir or lopinavir to darunavir
Sophie Jose1, Mark Nelson, Andrew Phillips
1aResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College LondonbChelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, LondoncSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, MiddlesbroughdHIV I-Base, LondoneBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals, BrightonfKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Objective:
Atazanavir (ATV) and lopinavir (LPV) have been associated with kidney disease progression in HIV positive patients, with no data reported for darunavir (DRV). We examined kidney function in patients who switched their protease inhibitor from ATV or LPV to DRV.
Design:
Cohort study.
Methods:
Data were from the UK CHIC study. We compared pre and post switch estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes (expressed in ml/min per 1.73 m per year) in all switchers and those with rapid eGFR decline (>5 ml/min per 1.73 m per year) on ATV or LPV. Mixed-effects models were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, eGFR at switch and time updated CD4 cell count, HIV RNA and cumulative tenofovir (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) exposure.
Results:
Data from 1430 patients were included. At the time of switching to DRV, median age was 45 years, 79% were men, 76% had an undetectable viral load, and median eGFR was 93 ml/min per 1.73 m. Adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) pre and post switch eGFR slopes were -0.84 (-1.31, -0.36) and 1.23 (0.80, 1.66) for ATV (P < 0.001), and -0.57 (-1.09, -0.05) and 0.62 (0.28, 0.96) for LPV (P < 0.001). Stable or improved renal function was observed in patients with rapid eGFR decline on ATV or LPV who switched to DRV [-15.27 (-19.35, -11.19) and 3.72 (1.78, 5.66), P < 0.001 for ATV, -11.93 (-14.60, -9.26) and 0.87 (-0.54, 2.27), P < 0.001 for LPV]. Similar results were obtained if participants who discontinued tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at the time of switch were excluded.
Conclusions:
We report improved kidney function in patients who switched from ATV or LPV to DRV, suggesting that DRV may have a more favourable renal safety profile.
Related Concept Videos
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

