Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Adan Mora1, Brian S Krug1, Antony M Grigonis1
1Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (Mora) and Select Medical Corporation, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania (Krug, Grigonis, Dawson, Jing, Hammerman).
This study evaluated a quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing unnecessary laboratory testing in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Nine hospitals with high lab utilization rates were selected for the study. Hospital staff and physicians met to develop and implement strategies to address lab overuse. Lab utilization was measured before and after the intervention. The results showed a significant decrease in lab testing without any negative impact on patient safety or outcomes. The study suggests that tailored strategies and physician education can help reduce unnecessary lab tests in LTACHs.
Area of Science:
Background:
Inappropriate use of laboratory tests in healthcare settings can lead to unnecessary procedures and increased risk of complications. For patients in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs), repeated and non-essential testing may contribute to avoidable blood draws and infections. Prior research has shown that high rates of lab utilization can occur in these settings without clear clinical benefit. It was already known that overuse of diagnostic tests can strain healthcare resources and affect patient safety. However, no prior work had resolved how to effectively reduce lab testing in LTACHs without compromising care quality. This gap motivated the development of targeted strategies to address lab utilization. LTACHs serve a unique patient population with complex and prolonged care needs. Understanding how to optimize lab testing in this environment is essential for improving patient outcomes and resource use.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a quality improvement initiative on laboratory test utilization in LTACHs. The specific problem addressed was the overuse of routine lab tests among chronically critically ill patients. The motivation for the study was to reduce unnecessary testing while maintaining patient safety and clinical outcomes. The researchers proposed that physician education and hospital-specific strategies could lead to more appropriate lab use. No prior work had resolved the effectiveness of such interventions in LTACHs. The study focused on measuring changes in lab utilization before and after the implementation of the intervention. The goal was to determine if these strategies could reduce lab testing without harming patient care. The researchers also sought to assess whether the intervention affected other quality metrics.
Main Methods:
The study was conducted within a large network of LTACHs across the United States. Nine hospitals were selected based on higher-than-average lab utilization rates. Hospital staff and physicians participated in meetings to design and implement tailored strategies for reducing lab testing. Lab utilization was measured in units of lab tests per inpatient day (lab UPPD). Data were collected for 8 months before the intervention and 7 months after. A repeated measures mixed model was used to analyze the change in lab utilization. The case mix index was adjusted to account for differences in patient severity. The study also tracked several patient safety and outcome metrics, including ventilator weaning and infection rates. The intervention focused on physician awareness and hospital-level policy changes.
Main Results:
The study found that lab utilization decreased by an average of 0.37 lab UPPD after the intervention. This reduction was statistically significant (t = -3.61, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.58). The case mix index remained stable before and after the intervention (t[8] = -0.96, P = 0.37). No significant changes were observed in ventilator weaning rates or readmission rates. Central catheter utilization and infection rates also showed no significant differences. The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other multidrug-resistant organisms remained unchanged. The study demonstrated that tailored strategies could reduce lab testing without affecting patient safety. The results suggest that physician education and hospital-level interventions can lead to more efficient lab use.
Conclusions:
The authors concluded that hospital staff meetings focused on lab utilization were associated with a significant reduction in lab testing. The intervention did not compromise patient safety or clinical outcomes. The reduction in lab UPPD was maintained after adjusting for patient severity. The study supports the use of tailored strategies to address lab overuse in LTACHs. The authors propose that physician engagement and hospital-specific approaches are effective in improving lab utilization. The findings suggest that quality improvement initiatives can lead to more appropriate testing practices. The study did not find any negative effects on patient outcomes or safety. The results indicate that reducing unnecessary lab testing is feasible in LTACHs without harming care quality.
The initiative reduced lab utilization by an average of 0.37 lab UPPD after implementation.
Nine hospitals were chosen based on higher-than-average lab utilization rates.
Adjusting for the case mix index ensured that changes in lab utilization were not due to differences in patient severity.
The study monitored ventilator weaning, readmission rates, and infection rates.
No significant change was observed in the incidence of MRSA or other resistant organisms.
The authors propose that physician engagement and education can lead to more appropriate lab use.