Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

07:13
Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
Published on: October 20, 2021
4.1K
Ultra-low frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation does not affect the centric relation registration
Rafaella Mariana Fontes de Bragança1, Carolina Almeida Rodrigues1, Melissa Oliveira Melchior1
1a Department of Restorative Dentistry , School of Dentistry of Ribeirão, São Paulo University , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil.
Cranio : the Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
|January 28, 2017
Summary
Ultra-low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ULF-TENS) did not affect mandibular condyle displacement. However, ULF-TENS improved the repeatability of bimanual manipulation for centric relation registration.
Area of Science:
- Dental occlusion and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) biomechanics.
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation applications in dentistry.
Background:
- Accurate centric relation (CR) registration is crucial for dental treatment planning.
- Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) can affect the reliability of CR records.
- Ultra-low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ULF-TENS) is explored for potential therapeutic effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of ULF-TENS on mandibular condyle displacement during CR registration.
- To evaluate the influence of ULF-TENS on the repeatability of three CR registration techniques: bimanual manipulation (BM), long strip technique, and harmonic centric occlusal relationship (R.O.C.A. wires).
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five participants without TMD were enrolled.
- Electronic position analysis was used to record CR.
- CR registration was performed using three techniques before and after ULF-TENS application (30 minutes).
Main Results:
- ULF-TENS did not significantly alter overall condyle displacement across any technique (p > 0.05).
- The bimanual manipulation (BM) technique demonstrated improved repeatability following ULF-TENS application.
- Specific axes showed varying degrees of reduced variability: BM (X-axis), long strip and R.O.C.A. wires (Y-axis), and long strip technique (Z-axis).
Conclusions:
- ULF-TENS does not significantly influence mandibular condyle displacement during CR registration.
- The bimanual manipulation technique shows enhanced repeatability with ULF-TENS.
- Different CR registration methods exhibit distinct patterns of variability reduction along specific axes after ULF-TENS application.
Keywords:
Jaw relation recorddental occlusionmandibular condyletranscutaneous electric nerve stimulation
