Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Early maxillary orthopedics in CLP cases: guidelines for surgery
Insights
Early orthopedic treatment for cleft lip and palate is less effective without proper surgical timing. Delayed, two-step palatal closure surgery supports better skeletal growth and speech development compared to classical methods.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial surgery
- Pediatric plastic surgery
- Speech pathology
Background:
- Cleft lip and palate (CLP) management involves early orthopedic procedures and surgical repair.
- Optimal timing for surgical interventions remains a critical factor in long-term outcomes.
- Previous studies highlight the impact of surgical timing on facial growth and speech.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term effects of "classical" versus delayed conservative surgical management in complete cleft cases.
- To evaluate the influence of surgical timing on skeletal growth and speech development.
- To determine the significance of surgical compliance with growth and functional requirements.
Main Methods:
- Comparative study of two groups of children (5-7 years) with complete cleft lip and palate (CLP).
- Group 1: "Classical" surgery (lip repair at 3 months, palate repair at 2-2.5 years).
- Group 2: Delayed conservative surgery (lip repair at 6 months, soft palate at 18 months, hard palate at 6-8 years).
- All patients received identical early orthopedic interventions.
Main Results:
- Early orthopedic treatment alone has limited long-term impact without synchronized surgical timing.
- Delayed, two-step palatal closure surgery demonstrated more favorable skeletal growth outcomes.
- The delayed surgical approach did not significantly impede speech development compared to the classical method.
Conclusions:
- Surgical management timing is crucial for optimizing outcomes in complete cleft lip and palate cases.
- A delayed, two-step palatal closure strategy appears superior to classical single-stage repair for skeletal development.
- Functional requirements, including speech, are better preserved with appropriately timed surgical interventions.
Abstract:
Two samples of complete cleft cases between five and seven years of age are compared (11 UCLP + 9 BCLP versus 21 UCLP + 12 BCLP). The same early orthopedic procedures were applied to all cases, but surgical management differed for the two groups: "classical" surgery (lip 3 months, palate 2--2 1/2 years) versus delayed conservative surgery (lip 6 months, soft palate 18 months, hard palate 6--8 years). It is evident that early maxillary orthopedic treatment is of little consequence for long-term development unless concomitant surgery complies with growth and functional requirements. In contrast to "classical" surgery, palatal closure in two steps is more favourable to skeletal growth and does not interfere to any relevant degree with speech development.

