Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Determinants of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. An observational study using
Zouhair Rahhab1, Nahid El Faquir1, Ramón Rodríguez-Olivares1
1Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Backgkground:
The aim of this paper was to explore the determinants of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) instead of echocardiography-guided sizing.
Methods:
Determinants of AR were assessed in 313 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with the Medtronic (MCS, N.=259) or Edwards Sapien or XT (ESV, N.=54) using MSCT-guided sizing. AR was assessed by angiography immediately after TAVI (N.=313, Sellers) and by echocardiography at discharge (N.=285, VARC-2). Distinction was made between patients with grade 0-1 and grade ≥2 AR post-TAVI.
Results:
AR≥2 post-TAVI was seen in 91 patients or 29% (MCS 85/259: 33% vs. ESV 6/54:11%) by angiography and 94 patients or 33% (MCS 87/239:36% vs. ESV 7/46:15%) by echocardiography. By univariable analysis, patients with AR≥2 post TAVI had more AR≥2 at baseline (70% vs. 52%, P=0.003), a larger mean and maximal annulus diameter (25.0 [23.5-26.3] vs. 24.0 [22.6-26.0], P=0.025 and 27.9±2.7 mm vs. 27.0±2.8 mm, P=0.018, respectively) and a higher Agatston Score (3.9 [2.9-5.3] vs. 2.6 [1.8-3.8], P≤0.001). AR≥2 post-TAVI was more frequent after MCS than ESV (33% vs. 11%, P=0.001). There was no difference in nominal valve size relative to the patient's annulus, nor depth of implantation. By propensity score adjusted multivariable analysis, AR≥2 at baseline (odds 2.407 [95% CI: 1.472-3.938]) but above all MCS (odds: 6.047 [95% CI; 1.307- 27.976]) were independent determinants of AR≥2 post-TAVI. The latter was also confirmed by propensity score adjusted multivariable analysis in the echocardiography population (N.=285) (odds: 5.259 [95% CI; 1.070-25.851]).
Conclusions:
AR≥2 is more prevalent after MCS valve implantation and is an independent determinant of AR also when using MSCT guided-sizing.
More Related Videos
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
11:16In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management