Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of the methodological quality of two contradictory guidelines recently published by the Haute autorité de

Joseph Watine1, Julien Wils2, Christine Augereau3

  • 1Laboratoire de biologie polyvalente, Hôpital général, Villefranche-de-Rouergue, France.

Insights

Two French guidelines on vitamin D testing in chronic kidney disease patients contradict recommendations. A quality assessment suggests the 2013 guideline is more rigorously developed and has higher editorial independence than the 2012 guideline.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Health Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Two conflicting guidelines from France's Haute autorité de santé (HAS) exist regarding vitamin D testing in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  • The 2012 guideline recommended annual vitamin D testing for all CKD patients.
  • The 2013 guideline restricted this testing to post-kidney transplant ambulatory follow-up.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the methodological quality of the 2012 and 2013 HAS guidelines.
  • To compare the development rigor and editorial independence of both guidelines using the AGREE instrument.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative evaluation of two clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument.
  • Analysis focused on guideline development rigor (domain 3) and editorial independence (domain 6).

Main Results:

  • The 2013 guideline scored higher in development rigor (57%) and editorial independence (56%) compared to the 2012 guideline (24% and 25%, respectively).
  • Despite higher scores, the AGREE tool's subjective value and identified shortcomings in both guidelines raise concerns.

Conclusions:

  • The methods used to develop both HAS guidelines are deemed too uncertain for unconditional use, particularly the 2012 guideline.
  • Recommendations from the 2013 guideline may hold higher validity due to more rigorous development, but caution is still advised.

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs01:19

Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs

Following these guidelines can help nurses accurately measure vital signs, assess changes in patient conditions, and provide timely treatment when necessary. Adhering closely to the guidelines ensures the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the patient.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...