Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Real-time Quaking-induced Conversion Assay for Detection of CWD Prions in Fecal Material
Published on: September 29, 2017
A Swiss cheese error detection method for real-time EPID-based quality assurance and error prevention
Michelle Passarge1,2, Michael K Fix1, Peter Manser1
1Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Berne, 3010, Switzerland.
A new Swiss cheese error detection (SCED) method effectively identifies relevant dose errors in radiation therapy. This advanced technique offers higher accuracy and identifies error sources, improving patient safety during VMAT treatments.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Image Analysis
Background:
- Quality assurance (QA) in external beam radiation therapy is crucial for patient safety.
- Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) requires precise dose delivery and robust QA methods.
- Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) offer opportunities for during-treatment monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust and efficient process for detecting relevant dose errors (≥5%) in external beam radiation therapy.
- To directly indicate the origin of detected dose errors.
- To implement and evaluate this process within an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based angle-resolved VMAT QA program for real-time monitoring.
Main Methods:
- A Swiss cheese error detection (SCED) method was developed for cine EPID-based during-treatment QA.
- The SCED method compares reference EPID images with images acquired at 2° gantry angle intervals during VMAT delivery.
- It employs a sequence of checks including aperture, output normalization, image alignment, and pixel intensity (gamma analysis and deviation checks).
Main Results:
- The SCED method detected 95.1% of relevant dose errors within 2° and 100% within 14° of gantry rotation.
- Even with clinically equivalent plan modifications, 89.1% of errors were detected within 2°.
- The SCED method demonstrated a higher detection rate (94.0%-95.8%) compared to standard gamma analysis (82.8%-89.8%) across various noise levels.
Conclusions:
- An EPID-frame-based error detection process (SCED) for VMAT was successfully designed and simulated.
- The SCED method is robust to noise variations and has the potential to detect a majority of relevant dose errors.
- Compared to standard gamma analysis, SCED offers higher detection rates, earlier error identification, and indicates the error source, enhancing VMAT QA.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Quality Assurance
Random and Systematic Errors
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...

