Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

An In vitro Model to Study Immune Responses of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells to Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Published on: December 10, 2013
A comparison of hospitalized children with enterovirus D68 to those with rhinovirus
Charles B Foster1, Ritika Coelho1, Paul M Brown2
1Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, Ohio.
Insights
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) was frequently misidentified as rhinovirus in hospitalized children, leading to underappreciation of its role in triggering asthma. This study highlights the need for accurate diagnostic assays to understand EV-D68
Area of Science:
- Pediatric respiratory infections
- Virology
- Asthma research
Background:
- Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) outbreaks in 2014 led to hospitalizations for pediatric respiratory distress.
- Many initial diagnoses incorrectly identified EV-D68 as rhinovirus due to cross-reactivity in common diagnostic panels.
- Existing assays lacked the specificity to differentiate between EV-D68 and rhinovirus, impacting accurate diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical presentation and outcomes of children diagnosed with rhinovirus versus EV-D68.
- To investigate the association between EV-D68 infection and asthma exacerbations.
- To evaluate the diagnostic limitations of multiplex respiratory viral panels during EV-D68 outbreaks.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 103 nasopharyngeal swabs from hospitalized children initially testing positive for rhinovirus.
- Specific retesting for EV-D68 to compare patient cohorts.
- Clinical data review including medical history, presenting symptoms, and treatment regimens.
Main Results:
- EV-D68 positive patients were significantly more likely to have a history of asthma (33.3% vs. 11.0%) and present with status asthmaticus (47.6% vs. 2.4%).
- Patients with EV-D68 exhibited increased wheezing, respiratory distress, and lower respiratory tract involvement.
- EV-D68 infections were associated with higher rates of steroid treatment and discharge on asthma medications, with less frequent viral coinfections.
Conclusions:
- EV-D68 is strongly associated with severe asthma exacerbations in children, often presenting as status asthmaticus.
- Diagnostic assay limitations in distinguishing EV-D68 from rhinovirus may have led to underestimation of EV-D68's role in asthma.
- Accurate viral diagnostics are crucial for understanding and managing pediatric respiratory illnesses, particularly in relation to asthma triggers.
Background:
During the Fall of 2014, numerous children were hospitalized with asthma or respiratory distress related to Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68). A large proportion initially tested positive for rhinovirus. During this period our laboratory noted a cross-reactivity between EV-D68 and the rhinovirus component of the GenMark multiplex respiratory viral panel. Many other laboratories used assays not designed to distinguish these Picornoviridae.
Methods:
To compare the presentation and outcomes of patients with rhinovirus and EV-D68, 103 GenMark rhinovirus positive nasopharyngeal swabs from hospitalized children were retested for EV-D68.
Results:
EV-D68 positive patients versus EV-D68 negative patients were more likely to have a history of asthma (33.3% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.02) and to present with acute respiratory illness (66.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.048), especially status asthmaticus (47.6% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001). On admission they had more wheezing, respiratory distress, and lower respiratory tract involvement, and were more likely to be treated with steroids and discharged home on asthma medications. Respiratory viral coinfection was less common in EV-D68 positive vs EV-D68 negative patients. In patients without a respiratory viral coinfection the overall findings were similar.
Conclusion:
Patients with EV-D68 versus rhinovirus were more likely to have a history of asthma, to present with status asthmaticus, to wheeze on admission, and to receive treatment with asthma medications in hospital and at discharge. The inability of common assays to distinguish EV-D68 from rhinoviruses raises the possibility that the role of EV-D68 as a viral trigger of asthma has been under appreciated. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:827-832. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Diphtheria
Viral Meningitis
Poliomyelitis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

