Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods

1.7K
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) atomizes samples through flame atomization or electrothermal atomization. Flame atomization typically involves a nebulizer and spray chamber assembly to combine the sample with a fuel–oxidant mixture, creating a fine aerosol mist that enters a burner. Typically, the fuel and oxidant are combined in an approximately stoichiometric ratio. However, for atoms that are easily oxidized, a fuel-rich mixture may be more advantageous. Only about 5% of the...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying Electronic Doorway States in Secondary Electron Emission from Layered Materials.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Thickness measurement of nm HfO<sub>2</sub> films.

Metrologia·2024
Same author

Characterization of buried interfaces using Ga Kα hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES).

Faraday discussions·2022
Same author

Comparisons of Analytical Approaches for Determining Shell Thicknesses of Core-Shell Nanoparticles by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.

The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces·2018
Same author

Effective attenuation lengths for quantitative determination of surface composition by Auger-electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena·2017
Same author

Calculations of Electron Inelastic Mean Free Paths. XI. Data for Liquid Water for Energies from 50 eV to 30 keV.

Surface and interface analysis : SIA·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis
06:24

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis

Published on: September 13, 2020

9.1K

Evaluation of Two Methods for Determining Shell Thicknesses of Core-Shell Nanoparticles by X-ray Photoelectron

C J Powell1, W S M Werner2, A G Shard3

  • 1Materials Measurement Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8370, United States.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and Interfaces
|February 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Determining nanoparticle shell thickness using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) requires careful method selection. The Shard equation method proved accurate for core-shell nanoparticles, outperforming a planar film method.

More Related Videos

Synthesis, Characterization, and Functionalization of Hybrid Au/CdS and Au/ZnS Core/Shell Nanoparticles
08:19

Synthesis, Characterization, and Functionalization of Hybrid Au/CdS and Au/ZnS Core/Shell Nanoparticles

Published on: March 2, 2016

19.0K
A Continuous-flow Photocatalytic Reactor for the Precisely Controlled Deposition of Metallic Nanoparticles
11:49

A Continuous-flow Photocatalytic Reactor for the Precisely Controlled Deposition of Metallic Nanoparticles

Published on: April 10, 2019

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis
06:24

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis

Published on: September 13, 2020

9.1K
Synthesis, Characterization, and Functionalization of Hybrid Au/CdS and Au/ZnS Core/Shell Nanoparticles
08:19

Synthesis, Characterization, and Functionalization of Hybrid Au/CdS and Au/ZnS Core/Shell Nanoparticles

Published on: March 2, 2016

19.0K
A Continuous-flow Photocatalytic Reactor for the Precisely Controlled Deposition of Metallic Nanoparticles
11:49

A Continuous-flow Photocatalytic Reactor for the Precisely Controlled Deposition of Metallic Nanoparticles

Published on: April 10, 2019

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Surface Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Accurate determination of shell thickness in core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) is crucial for understanding their properties.
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a common surface-sensitive technique for elemental analysis and chemical state determination.
  • Existing methods for thickness determination may not be suitable for the unique geometry of NPs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare two distinct methods for determining the shell thicknesses of core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) using XPS.
  • To assess the performance of these methods under varying conditions, including the presence and absence of elastic scattering effects.
  • To identify the most reliable method for accurate shell thickness quantification in NPs.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Cu 2p3/2 spectra were generated for copper core/copper shell NPs.
  • Two methods were evaluated: one for planar films and another specifically developed for NPs (Shard equation).
  • Simulations allowed for the evaluation of methods with and without elastic scattering effects.

Main Results:

  • The method developed for planar films was found to be unsatisfactory for NP shell thickness determination.
  • The Shard equation method, specifically designed for NPs, provided satisfactory results across all simulated conditions.
  • Average deviations from true shell thicknesses were -4.1% (with elastic scattering) and -2.2% (without elastic scattering) using the Shard equation.

Conclusions:

  • The empirical equation developed by Shard is a reliable method for determining shell thicknesses in core-shell nanoparticles via XPS.
  • The choice of electron transport parameter (effective attenuation length vs. inelastic mean free path) depends on whether elastic scattering is considered.
  • Accurate shell thickness analysis of NPs using XPS necessitates employing methods tailored to their unique morphology.