Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.1K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.0K
Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

25.7K
To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
25.7K
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

38.3K
Overview
38.3K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

37.9K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.9K
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

27.1K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
27.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TCR-Independent Metabolic Reprogramming Precedes Lymphoma-Driven Changes in T-cell Fate.

Cancer immunology research·2022
Same author

Climate drives coupled regime shifts across subtropical estuarine ecosystems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Age and growth of one of the world's largest carnivorous gastropods, the Florida Horse Conch, Triplofusus giganteus (Kiener, 1840), a target of unregulated, intense harvest.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Natural recovery of a marine foundation species emerges decades after landscape-scale mortality.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Prehistoric baseline reveals substantial decline of oyster reef condition in a Gulf of Mexico conservation priority area.

Biology letters·2020
Same author

Long-term performance of seagrass restoration projects in Florida, USA.

Scientific reports·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.5K

Three-dimensional interstitial space mediates predator foraging success in different spatial arrangements.

Stephen G Hesterberg1, C Cole Duckett1, Elizabeth A Salewski1

  • 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Ave, SCA 110, Tampa, Florida, 33620, USA.

Ecology
|February 2, 2017
PubMed
Summary

The three-dimensional structure of oyster reefs significantly impacts predator-prey dynamics. Habitat complexity, specifically the orientation and shape of interstitial spaces, influences blue crab foraging success on mud crabs.

Keywords:
3D printinghabitat complexityhabitat structureinterstitial spacepredator-prey interactionsspatial arrangement

More Related Videos

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

13.0K
A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.5K
Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

13.0K
A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Marine Ecology
  • Habitat Structure
  • Predator-Prey Interactions

Background:

  • Quantifying habitat structure's role in predator-prey interactions is challenging.
  • Previous studies often use 1D/2D metrics and neglect 3D spatial arrangement.
  • Oyster reefs provide complex interstitial spaces crucial for marine life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if the three-dimensionality of interstitial space in oyster reefs affects predator foraging success.
  • To investigate the impact of spatial arrangement (orientation, shape) of shell components on refuge quality.
  • To quantify how 3D aspects of habitat influence blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) predation on mud crabs (Eurypanopeus depressus).

Main Methods:

  • Field and mesocosm experiments using 3D-printed oyster shell mimics.
  • Manipulation of interstitial space by altering mimic orientation (angle) and internal shape (crevice, channel).
  • Quantification of predator foraging success via mud crab survivorship under varying structural conditions.

Main Results:

  • Predator foraging success was significantly influenced by 3D interstitial space, independent of structural density.
  • Decreasing mud crab survivorship correlated with increasing orientation angle of shell mimics (0° to 45°).
  • Crevice and channel shapes showed high prey survivorship, with channel shapes yielding slightly higher success.

Conclusions:

  • Three-dimensional aspects of interstitial space are critical determinants of refuge quality and predator-prey interactions.
  • Spatial arrangement of habitat components significantly mediates consumptive pathways in structured environments.
  • Quantifying 3D habitat complexity provides crucial insights missing from previous ecological studies.