Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.5K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

805
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
805
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole-Genome Resequencing of <i>Cucurbita maxima</i> and <i>Cucurbita moschata</i> Provides Insights into Genomic Variants Associated with Morphology and Quality Traits.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a Cunninghamia lanceolata common garden experiment in Dagangshan.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Ultrahigh Energy Storage Density Achieved in Freestanding (Pb<sub>0.98</sub>La<sub>0.02</sub>)(Zr<sub>0.85-<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Hf<sub>0.15</sub>)<sub>0.995</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Antiferroelectric Thick Film Ceramics.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Characterization of an anti-STEAP1 T-cell dependent bispecific antibody for the treatment of prostate cancer and associated toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2026
Same author

Peer victimization and adolescent's social adjustment: Testing the mechanism of the healthy context paradox in a two-wave study.

Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence·2025
Same author

Factors associated with depression and cognitive impairment after cerebral hemorrhage surgery.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

The impact of variable commitment in the Naming Game on consensus formation.

Xiang Niu1,2, Casey Doyle1,3, Gyorgy Korniss1,3

  • 1Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center, Troy, NY, 12180, USA.

Scientific Reports
|February 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces variable commitment strength into the Naming Game model, affecting opinion dynamics in complex networks. Modifying commitment influences the population fraction needed for minority consensus, with implications for social opinion formation.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Complex Systems
  • Social Dynamics
  • Network Science

Background:

  • The Naming Game is a key model for opinion dynamics in complex networks.
  • Previous models featured rigid commitment, limiting realistic opinion change.
  • Introducing committed nodes enriches the model but retains limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of variable commitment strength on opinion dynamics.
  • To analyze how commitment flexibility affects consensus formation in networks.
  • To explore the role of commitment strength distribution in opinion spread.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of the Naming Game model to include variable commitment strength (w).
  • Analysis of commitment strength's effect on the critical fraction for minority consensus.
  • Examination of systems with heterogeneous commitment strengths (varying w values).

Main Results:

  • Variable commitment strength alters the critical population fraction required for consensus.
  • Increasing commitment strength lowers the critical fraction for waning commitment.
  • Increasing commitment strength raises the critical fraction for increasing commitment.
  • Higher standard deviation in commitment strength impacts critical fractions differently for waning versus increasing commitment.

Conclusions:

  • Variable commitment strength offers a more flexible and realistic approach to modeling opinion dynamics.
  • Commitment flexibility is a crucial factor influencing the ease of achieving minority consensus.
  • The distribution of commitment strengths within a population significantly shapes opinion dynamics and consensus outcomes.