Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

549
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
549
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

426
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
426
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of goals, actions, and outcomes in the sense of agency.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Recent discoveries on the acquisition of the highest levels of human performance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in patient portal messaging in primary care.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

Testing the Deliberate Practice Theory: Does Practice Reduce the Heritability of Musical Expertise?

Journal of Intelligence·2024
Same author

Accelerating Visual Anticipation in Sport Through Temporal Occlusion Training: A Meta-Analysis.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2024
Same author

Explaining the Validity of the ASVAB for Job-Relevant Multitasking Performance: The Role of Placekeeping Ability.

Journal of Intelligence·2023
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K

Effects of interruption length on procedural errors.

Erik M Altmann1, J Gregory Trafton2, David Z Hambrick1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|February 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Task interruptions disrupt procedural performance. Longer interruptions increase sequence errors by affecting memory for task steps, not general attention.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Task interruptions are common in daily activities and complex tasks.
  • Understanding how interruptions affect performance is crucial for optimizing task design and user experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of interruption length on procedural performance.
  • To differentiate the effects of interruption length on sequence errors versus non-sequence errors.
  • To refine a cognitive model explaining interruption effects on procedural memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a procedural task with varying interruption lengths.
  • Error rates, specifically sequence and non-sequence errors, were analyzed at task resumption.
  • A previously developed cognitive model was used to interpret the findings.

Main Results:

  • Interruption length significantly affected sequence errors (loss of place) but not non-sequence errors (incorrect execution).
  • Sequence errors showed a complex pattern related to interruption length, differing for step repetitions versus other offsets.
  • Findings suggest memory for past performance is more susceptible to interruption than generalized attentional resources.

Conclusions:

  • Procedural memory, specifically the retention of sequential steps, is impaired by task interruptions.
  • The cognitive model accurately predicts interruption effects based on memory decay and rehearsal mechanisms.
  • Intervention strategies should focus on mitigating the impact of interruptions on procedural memory for sequential tasks.