Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

307
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
307
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

47.0K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
47.0K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.9K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.6K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.6K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.0K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.0K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

805
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
805

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual-peptide engineered macrophage membrane biomimetic nanosystem via targeting Rg1 delivery for traumatic brain injury therapy.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026
Same author

HDAC3 blockade inhibits neuroinflammation and pyroptosis to prevent dopaminergic neuron death in Parkinson's disease models.

Neural regeneration research·2026
Same author

Reprogramming of astrocytes into motoneuron-like cells by a Ascl1-Myt1l-Pou3f2-Isl1 cocktail.

Experimental cell research·2026
Same author

Clinical comparative analysis of endoscopic thyroidectomy via the thoracoareolar approach versus open surgery for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Medicine·2026
Same author

3-n-Butylphthalide Protects SH-SY5Y Cells from Ferroptosis by Inhibiting ACSL4-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation.

Molecular neurobiology·2026
Same author

Protective Effects of Neuron-Derived Quiescin Sulfhydryl Oxidase 1 Protein on Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)·2026
Same journal

Colour blindness adversely impacts face recognition.

Visual cognition·2026
Same journal

Confidence in incomplete visual search.

Visual cognition·2026
Same journal

The Predictive Ability of GBVS Feature Channels on Infants' Fixations of Natural Scenes.

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

Learned relevance of a distracting cue can influence feature interference errors.

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

How Does Mind-Wandering Affect Distractor Suppression?

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K

Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Jianhong Shen1, Thomas J Palmeri1

  • 1Vanderbilt University.

Visual Cognition
|February 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computational models explain how people differ in visual categorization. This review traces how models evolved to capture individual differences in grouping objects, offering insights into visual cognition.

Keywords:
computational modelingindividual differencevisual categorization

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Growing interest in individual differences in visual cognition.
  • Focus on individual differences in visual categorization, a fundamental visual ability.
  • Research heavily influenced by computational modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Review how computational models capture individual differences in visual categorization.
  • Examine how individual differences inform the development of these models.
  • Provide historical perspective on models of visual categorization.

Main Methods:

  • Examining potential sources of individual differences in leading visual categorization models.
  • Reviewing a range of computational models.
  • Describing examples of models capturing individual differences.

Main Results:

  • Models evolved from predicting no differences to capturing group and individual variations.
  • Hierarchical approaches can simultaneously model group and individual differences.
  • Consideration of individual differences yields theoretical insights into object categorization.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences are crucial for understanding visual categorization.
  • Computational models provide a framework for studying these differences.
  • Future work can further explore individual variations in visual cognition.