Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

08:16
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
19.5K
Top-down vs. bottom-up control on vegetation composition in a tidal marsh depends on scale
Kelly Elschot1, Anke Vermeulen2, Wouter Vandenbruwaene3
1Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences GELIFES, University of Groningen, CC Groningen, The Netherlands.
Plos One
|February 4, 2017
Summary
In tidal marshes, sediment accretion (bottom-up) drives long-term vegetation change over decades, while goose foraging (top-down) has minor, short-term impacts at local scales.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Environmental Science
- Plant Ecology
Background:
- The interplay between herbivore (top-down) and environmental (bottom-up) controls on vegetation dynamics is a key ecological question.
- Tidal marsh ecosystems are influenced by both grazing pressure and abiotic factors like sediment accretion.
- Understanding the scale-dependent effects of these controls is crucial for predicting marsh resilience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relative importance of top-down (goose foraging) and bottom-up (sediment accretion) controls on vegetation composition in a dynamic tidal marsh.
- To determine how spatial and temporal scales influence the impact of herbivory and environmental factors on marsh vegetation.
- To test the hypothesis that these controls can co-occur but operate at different scales.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dynamic tidal marsh system with a significant Greylag goose population (Anser anser).
- Observed local-scale herbivore foraging impacts (bare patches) and their recovery rates.
- Assessed large-scale, long-term vegetation changes in relation to sediment accretion rates and sea-level rise.
Main Results:
- Greylag geese exerted top-down control locally by creating small, bare patches through grubbing.
- These disturbed patches reverted to their initial vegetation type within approximately 12 years.
- At larger spatial (km²) and temporal (decades) scales, high sediment accretion rates (> sea-level rise) drove vegetation succession towards climax types.
Conclusions:
- Vegetation composition in this tidal marsh is primarily driven by bottom-up sediment accretion operating at large spatial and temporal scales.
- Top-down control by goose herbivory is a secondary process with significant effects only at smaller spatial and temporal scales.
- Scale-dependency is critical in understanding the balance between biotic and abiotic forces shaping ecosystem structure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Primary Production
25.8K
The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
25.8K
Responses to Gravity and Touch
42.2K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
42.2K
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
31.8K
During photosynthesis, plants acquire the necessary carbon dioxide and release the produced oxygen back into the atmosphere. Openings in the epidermis of plant leaves is the site of this exchange of gasses. A single opening is called a stoma—derived from the Greek word for “mouth.” Stomata open and close in response to a variety of environmental cues.
31.8K
Ecological Succession
21.9K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
21.9K
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
28.4K
Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.
28.4K
Tonicity in Plants
36.1K
Plant cells maintain appropriate osmotic balance in extreme conditions. For instance, plants in dry environments store water in vacuoles, limit the opening of their stoma, and have thick, waxy cuticles to prevent unnecessary water loss. Some species of plants that live in salty environments store salt in their roots. As a result, water osmosis occurs in the root from the surrounding soil.
Tonicity
Tonicity describes the capacity of a cell to lose or gain water depending on the solute...
Tonicity
Tonicity describes the capacity of a cell to lose or gain water depending on the solute...
36.1K

