Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Familial Hypercholesterolemia Human Liver Chimeric Mouse Model Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Hepatocytes
Published on: September 15, 2018
Impact of clinical signs and genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia on the prevalence of coronary artery
Hayato Tada1, Masa-Aki Kawashiri1, Atsushi Nohara1
1Department of Cardiovascular and Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) clinical signs and genetic mutations significantly increase coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Combining clinical signs with genetic testing provides a more accurate CAD risk assessment in patients with high LDL cholesterol.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Genetics
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by extremely high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.
- The independent impact of clinical signs (xanthoma, family history) and genetic mutation status on coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, beyond LDL cholesterol levels, requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the combined effect of clinical FH signs and FH mutation status on CAD risk in individuals with severely elevated LDL cholesterol.
- To determine if clinical signs and genetic diagnosis add to the risk prediction provided by LDL cholesterol alone.
Main Methods:
- Sequenced three genes (LDLR, APOB, PCSK9) in 636 patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia (LDL cholesterol ≥180 mg/dL or ≥140 mg/dL for <15 years).
- Assessed the presence of clinical FH signs (xanthoma and/or family history).
- Compared CAD prevalence across four groups: no FH mutation/no clinical signs, clinical signs only, FH mutation only, and both clinical signs and FH mutation, adjusting for known risk factors.
Main Results:
- Subjects with clinical FH signs or FH mutations had 3- to 4-fold increased odds of CAD compared to those without.
- Individuals with both clinical FH signs and FH mutations exhibited over an 11-fold higher odds of developing CAD.
- These associations remained significant after adjusting for LDL cholesterol and other risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Positive clinical signs and genetic mutation status for FH have an additive effect on CAD risk.
- Integrating clinical assessment with genetic testing improves CAD risk stratification in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

