Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction Model for Investigating Kidney Interstitial Fibrosis
Published on: April 25, 2025
Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study
Kenneth T Pace1, Tad Kroczak1, Nienke J Wijnstok2
1Division of Urology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bilateral ureteroscopy for multiple stones leads to lower stone-free rates and longer operative times compared to ipsilateral treatment for single stones. However, both approaches are safe with similar complication rates.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Endourology
- Nephrolithiasis Management
Background:
- Ureteroscopy is a common procedure for treating ureteral and renal stones.
- Comparing outcomes for ipsilateral versus bilateral ureteroscopy, and for single versus multiple stones, is crucial for optimizing patient care.
- International data provides a robust basis for evaluating these treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare international outcomes of ipsilateral and bilateral ureteroscopy for treating multiple, bilateral ureteral and renal stones versus single stone treatment.
- To analyze patient and treatment characteristics and their impact on outcomes.
- To provide evidence-based insights into the efficacy and safety of different ureteroscopy approaches.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Ureteroscopy Global Study (114 centers, 32 countries).
- Included 11,885 patients treated between January 2010 and October 2012.
- Employed inverse probability weighted regression adjustment analyses to compare outcomes, controlling for patient and center variations.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 2,153 patients with multiple stones revealed that bilateral ureteroscopy (12.7%) had lower stone-free rates, higher re-treatment rates, and longer operative times than ipsilateral ureteroscopy (87.3%).
- Compared to single stone treatment, multiple stone treatments (bilateral or ipsilateral) showed decreased stone-free rates and increased operative times.
- No significant differences in complication rates were observed across bilateral, ipsilateral, or single stone ureteroscopy procedures.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral ureteroscopy and treatment of multiple stones are associated with reduced stone-free rates, increased re-treatment rates, and longer operative times compared to ipsilateral ureteroscopy and single stone treatment, respectively.
- Despite outcome differences, bilateral ureteroscopy and multiple stone treatments are considered safe procedures.
- Findings support careful consideration of treatment strategy based on stone burden and laterality to optimize outcomes in ureteroscopy.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urinary Tract Calculi I: Introduction

