Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

273.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
273.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

70.2K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
70.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.8K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.8K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

77.1K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.1K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

44.7K
Overview
44.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The interaction between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in a diverse central London population.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Viral hepatitis and liver disease in the Mongolian community in London ('MoLo'): A mixed methods study protocol to investigate the epidemiology and burden of disease to inform clinical and public health interventions.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

From targets to real world impact: a review of models of care for chronic HBV and HCV in Europe.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

A changing HIV treatment landscape: what does lenacapavir mean for people living with HBV?

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same author

Global inequities in hepatitis B and C genomic surveillance revealed through an interactive data integration dashboard.

Public health·2026
Same author

Elimination in the age of retrenchment: what hepatitis reveals about the future of global health.

The Lancet. Global health·2026
Same journal

The Outcome of Cardiac Hydatid Surgery in The Iraqi Center of Heart Diseases.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Perception of body donation among the Phase-1 medical students, a questionnaire-based study.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Infertility in Saudi Arabia: Qualitative Insights into IVF Treatment Services and Policy Recommendations.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Cyber Military Operations under International Humanitarian Law: Interpreting the Concept of "Attack" and Challenges in Protecting Civilians.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Sentiment Analysis of Acceptance TVET Online Courses on the Skill Academy App from Google Play: Leveraging Text Mining with Comparison Machine Learning Model.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence: An important skill to learn now more than ever.

F1000Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K

Fairness in scientific publishing.

Philippa C Matthews1

  • 1Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Harris Manchester College, Oxford, UK; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

F1000Research
|February 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Academic publishing is evolving with new platforms, metrics, peer review, and open access initiatives. A fair approach to scientific data dissemination requires considering equity and justice for all stakeholders.

Keywords:
Academic publishingdata visualizationimpact factormetricsopen accesspeer review

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly Communication
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Data Dissemination

Background:

  • Academic publishing is undergoing significant transformations.
  • Innovations include new publishing platforms, revised metrics, and enhanced peer review processes.
  • There is a growing emphasis on open access for scientific literature and data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a broader interpretation of 'FAIR' data principles, extending beyond Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable.
  • To promote a 'fair' dissemination of scientific data, emphasizing equity and justice for all involved parties.
  • To address current challenges in scientific publishing and data sharing.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of the concept of 'fair' data dissemination through an opinion article.
  • Foundation of views on dialogue with clinicians, academics, and the publishing industry.
  • Identification of areas needing improvement in collaboration and dialogue.

Main Results:

  • Identified the need for collective action towards equitable and just scientific data dissemination.
  • Highlighted challenges such as misinterpretation of metrics, geographic inequities, and economic sustainability.
  • Stressed the importance of broadening the scope and diversity of scientific publications.

Conclusions:

  • A call for a more equitable and just approach to scientific data dissemination beyond technical standards.
  • Emphasizes the need for improved collaboration and dialogue among stakeholders in academic publishing.
  • Advocates for greater inclusivity and diversity in scientific publications to ensure fair representation.