Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies
Cody Chiuzan1, Jonathan Shtaynberger1, Gulam A Manji2
1a Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health , Columbia University , New York , New York , USA.
Abstract:
Recently, there has been a surge of early phase trials of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) and immunotherapies. These new therapies have different toxicity profiles compared to cytotoxic therapies. MTAs can benefit from new trial designs that allow inclusion of low-grade toxicities, late-onset toxicities, addition of an efficacy endpoint, and flexibility in the specification of a target toxicity probability. To study the degree of adoption of these methods, we conducted a Web of Science search of articles published between 2008 and 2014 that describe phase 1 oncology trials. Trials were categorized based on the dose-finding design used and the type of drug studied. Out of 1,712 dose-finding trials that met our criteria, 1,591 (92.9%) utilized a rule-based design, and 92 (5.4%; range 2.3% in 2009 to 9.7% in 2014) utilized a model-based or novel design. Over half of the trials tested an MTA or immunotherapy. Among the MTA and immunotherapy trials, 5.8% used model-based methods, compared to 3.9% and 8.3% of the chemotherapy or radiotherapy trials, respectively. While the percentage of trials using novel dose-finding designs has tripled since 2007, the adoption of these designs continues to remain low.
Insights
Novel dose-finding designs for early phase oncology trials are underutilized. Despite a tripling in adoption, rule-based designs remain dominant, even for molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Early phase oncology trials are increasingly using molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) and immunotherapies.
- These novel therapies possess distinct toxicity profiles compared to traditional cytotoxic agents.
- Existing trial designs may not optimally accommodate the characteristics of new therapeutic agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the adoption rate of novel dose-finding designs in phase 1 oncology trials.
- To evaluate the utilization of advanced trial designs for molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies.
- To compare the use of novel designs across different therapeutic modalities.
Main Methods:
- A Web of Science search identified phase 1 oncology trials published between 2008 and 2014.
- Trials were categorized by dose-finding design (rule-based vs. model-based/novel) and drug type (MTA, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy).
- Statistical analysis was performed to determine adoption percentages and trends.
Main Results:
- Out of 1,712 trials, 92.9% used rule-based designs, while only 5.4% employed model-based or novel designs.
- Model-based designs were slightly more common in MTA/immunotherapy trials (5.8%) compared to chemotherapy (3.9%) or radiotherapy (8.3%).
- The percentage of trials using novel designs tripled from 2007 to 2014, but overall adoption remained low.
Conclusions:
- The adoption of innovative dose-finding methodologies in early phase oncology trials remains limited.
- Rule-based designs continue to dominate, despite the rise of targeted therapies and immunotherapies.
- Further research and implementation efforts are needed to increase the use of advanced trial designs.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Clinical Trials: Overview
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Drug Discovery: Overview
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

