Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

430
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
430
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

301
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
301
Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

64.0K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
64.0K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

51.1K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
51.1K
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

614
Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
614

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian credible sets for phylogenetic tree topologies with applications to coverage analysis and cross-model comparison.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Navigating the mysterious space of evolutionary histories.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Regenerative base editing enables deep lineage recording.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Bayesian Model Averaging of Parametric Coalescent Models for Phylodynamic Inference.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Reduced Amino Acid Substitution Matrices Find Traces of Ancient Coding Alphabets in Modern Day Proteins.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

BEAST X for Bayesian phylogenetic, phylogeographic and phylodynamic inference.

Nature methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.2K

bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison.

Remco R Bouckaert1,2,3, Alexei J Drummond4,5

  • 1Centre for Computational Evolution, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. remco@cs.auckland.ac.nz.

BMC Evolutionary Biology
|February 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian phylogenetics can now infer and marginalize site models directly within analyses using bModelTest. This avoids pre-determining models with likelihood methods, improving phylogenetic reconstruction accuracy.

Keywords:
Model averagingModel comparisonModel selectionModelTestPhylogenetic model averagingPhylogenetic model comparisonSite modelStatistical phylogeneticsSubstitution model

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.2K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Bayesian methods offer a robust framework for phylogenetic reconstruction, providing uncertainty estimates and integrating diverse data.
  • Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences require specifying site and substitution models.
  • Current methods often rely on pre-determining site models using likelihood-based approaches, which can be suboptimal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Bayesian approach for inferring and marginalizing site models in phylogenetic analyses.
  • To integrate site model selection directly into the phylogenetic inference process.
  • To offer a more flexible and statistically sound alternative to pre-determined model selection.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework within the bModelTest package for BEAST 2.
  • Enabled switching between various nucleotide substitution models.
  • Estimated posterior probabilities for rate heterogeneity (gamma distribution), proportion of invariable sites, and unequal base frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Successfully inferred and marginalized site models during the MCMC analysis.
  • Demonstrated the utility of bModelTest with the full set of time-reversible nucleotide models and introduced two subsets.
  • The method allows joint inference of site models and phylogenetic trees.

Conclusions:

  • bModelTest automates site model selection within a Bayesian framework, eliminating the need for separate, pre-determined analyses.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy and efficiency of phylogenetic reconstruction using nucleotide sequence data.
  • The bModelTest package is integrated into BEAST 2, providing an open-source solution for advanced phylogenetic analyses.