Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Machines: Problem Solving II01:30

Machines: Problem Solving II

717
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. Consider a lifting tong carrying a 100 kg load. It comprises movable sections DAF and CBG linked together with member AB.
717
Frames: Problem Solving I01:24

Frames: Problem Solving I

1.1K
Consider a jib crane with an external load suspended from the pulley. The dimensions of the crane members are shown in the figure. A systematic analysis of the frame structure is required to determine the reaction forces at the pin joints, assuming that the pulleys are frictionless.
1.1K
Frames: Problem Solving II01:26

Frames: Problem Solving II

532
Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
532
Work Done by Many Forces01:03

Work Done by Many Forces

6.1K
The total work done on an object acted upon by multiple forces can be computed using two methods that give the same result. In one method, the work done by each force is first calculated. Then, those values are summed algebraically to calculate the total work done by all the forces. In the second method, the net force is first calculated by a vector sum of all the forces. Then, the work done by this force is obtained.
Since forces perpendicular to the displacement do no work, they do not...
6.1K
Relation Between the Distributed Load and Shear01:23

Relation Between the Distributed Load and Shear

1.2K
Understanding the relationship between the distributed load and shear force in structural analysis is crucial for analyzing beams subjected to various loading conditions. Consider the case of a beam experiencing a distributed load, two concentrated loads, and a couple moment.
1.2K
Machines01:19

Machines

615
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. One example of a machine is the cutting plier, which is used to cut wires by applying forces to its handles. When equal and opposite forces are exerted on the handles of the cutting plier, they cause the cutting edges to come together and apply equal and opposite reaction forces on the wire, which are greater than the applied forces.
A free-body diagram of the...
615

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Haab's striae secondary to congenital glaucoma: Role of anterior segment OCT].

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2025
Same author

Third nerve schwannoma mimicking recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2024
Same author

Validation of proprioception measures of the lumbar spine.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2024
Same author

Epidemiological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Profile of Uveitis in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter Study.

Ocular immunology and inflammation·2024
Same author

Effect of personalized spinal profile on its biomechanical response in an EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the trunk.

Journal of biomechanics·2023
Same author

A new treatment changes the game: An innovative management of a child suffering from severe ligneous conjunctivitis with type 1 plasminogen deficiency.

The ocular surface·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Cantilever Bending of Murine Femoral Necks
06:44

Cantilever Bending of Murine Femoral Necks

Published on: January 5, 2022

2.5K

Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes.

A Plamondon1, C Larivière1, D Denis1

  • 1Institut de recherche Robert Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), 505 Boul. De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H3A 3C2, Canada.

Applied Ergonomics
|February 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Female and male workers exhibit distinct lifting techniques during manual material handling (MMH), even when loads are adjusted for strength. This sex-based difference in interjoint coordination may increase injury risk for females.

Keywords:
Interjoint coordinationLiftingManual material handlingSex

More Related Videos

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
09:29

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics

Published on: December 14, 2011

13.0K
A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice
06:59

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

Published on: April 28, 2022

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Cantilever Bending of Murine Femoral Necks
06:44

Cantilever Bending of Murine Femoral Necks

Published on: January 5, 2022

2.5K
Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
09:29

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics

Published on: December 14, 2011

13.0K
A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice
06:59

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

Published on: April 28, 2022

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Previous studies noted sex-based differences in manual material handling (MMH) lifting techniques.
  • These differences, particularly in posture and coordination, were initially attributed to strength disparities.
  • A key question remained whether these technique variations persisted when lifting loads relative to individual strength.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if female workers maintain distinct lifting biomechanics compared to males when handling loads adjusted for their respective strengths.
  • To determine if observed sex-based differences in lifting technique are intrinsic or solely due to absolute load differences.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed box lifting tasks from a pallet.
  • A dynamic 3D linked segment model estimated net moments at L5/S1.
  • Kinematic variables and task duration were analyzed to compare male and female lifting strategies with relative loads.

Main Results:

  • Lifting task duration and cumulative loading were similar between sexes when using relative loads.
  • Significant differences persisted in interjoint coordination patterns between male and female workers.
  • The distinct coordination pattern observed in females with absolute loads was replicated with relative loads.

Conclusions:

  • Sex appears to be a significant factor influencing lifting technique, independent of absolute or relative load.
  • The female interjoint coordination pattern may place greater strain on posterior passive tissues during ground lifts.
  • Further research is needed to identify the underlying reasons for these sex-specific biomechanical patterns to develop targeted injury prevention strategies.