Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

6.4K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
6.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.8K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.8K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

3.3K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.0K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.0K
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

309
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
309

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring attachment, trauma, and cannabis use in psychotic disorders: a qualitative study of patient and family perspectives.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

Outcomes of a joint paediatric breast clinic: an observational case series.

Archives of disease in childhood·2026
Same author

Lifetime Adversity Among Individuals With Early Phase Psychosis and Comorbid Substance Misuse.

Early intervention in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Estimating the scale of hospital admissions for people experiencing homelessness in England: a population-based multiple systems estimation study using national Hospital Episode Statistics.

BMJ public health·2025
Same author

Effects of perceived working alliance quality and congruence on naturalistic psychotherapy outcome: A response surface analysis.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2025
Same author

Direct air capture of CO<sub>2</sub> for solar fuel production in flow.

Nature energy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Statistical methodology for estimating the mean difference in a meta-analysis without study-specific variance

Patarawan Sangnawakij1, Dankmar Böhning2, Stephen Adams3

  • 1Department of Applied Statistics, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, 10800, Thailand.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces two novel methods for estimating study variances in meta-analyses when only means and sample sizes are available. These techniques improve statistical inference for comparing treatments, particularly in pediatric surgery and renal function studies.

Keywords:
likelihood ratio testmean differencemeta-analysis

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.4K
Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases
06:52

Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases

Published on: September 29, 2014

54.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.4K
Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases
06:52

Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases

Published on: September 29, 2014

54.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Meta-analysis typically requires study-specific variability estimates.
  • Many studies report only means and sample sizes, hindering traditional meta-analysis.
  • This limitation is common in comparing treatments like thoracoscopic vs. open surgery for pediatric lung malformations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for meta-analytic inference when only study means and sample sizes are available.
  • To propose techniques for estimating study-specific variances in such scenarios.
  • To evaluate the performance of these new methods and compare them to existing approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Developed two methods to estimate study-specific variances using only sample means and sizes.
  • Derived a general likelihood ratio test for equality of variances between two groups.
  • Conducted simulation studies to assess bias and standard error of the overall mean difference.
  • Evaluated the type I error rate of the proposed variance test.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods provide viable options for meta-analysis with limited data.
  • Simulation studies evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of the new estimation techniques.
  • The performance of the likelihood ratio test was assessed in terms of its statistical reliability.
  • Illustrative examples were provided using pediatric surgery and kidney donation data.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers practical solutions for conducting meta-analyses with incomplete variance data.
  • The developed methods enhance statistical inference in comparative effectiveness research.
  • These approaches are applicable to various medical research areas, including surgery and organ donation studies.