Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

PharmaTrend as a management tool: experience with the program.

D L Hand1, B D Haas

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Porter Memorial Hospital, Denver, CO 80210.

American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Images in vascular medicine. A variant of Mondor's disease.

Vascular medicine (London, England)·2007
Same author

[Mechanisms of azithromycin accumulation and efflux in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes].

Antibiotiki i khimioterapiia = Antibiotics and chemoterapy [sic]·2003
Same author

Characteristics and mechanisms of azithromycin accumulation and efflux in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

International journal of antimicrobial agents·2001
Same author

Massive periorbital lymphedema after excision of cutaneous malignancy.

Southern medical journal·1998
Same author

Influence of pentoxifylline and its derivatives on antibiotic uptake and superoxide generation by human phagocytic cells.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·1995
Same author

Interactions of dirithromycin with human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·1993
Same journal

National health care reform, Part 2: Response to pharmacists.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Validity of originality assessment.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Unit dose dispensing of chromic phosphate P 32 suspension.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Hydralazine injection still available.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Improved extemporaneous formulation of cyclosporine ophthalmic drops.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Paclitaxel diluent and the case of the slippery spike.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
See all related articles

PharmaTrend offers improved pharmacy workload measurement over the older PPU system by integrating diverse data for better analysis. While it enhances internal reporting, direct comparisons with other hospitals remain limited due to data consistency issues.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacy Administration
  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Hospitals utilize pharmacy workload measurement systems to manage resources effectively.
  • The Pharmacy Productivity Unit (PPU) system was an early, locally developed tool for this purpose.
  • Limitations in PPU included inadequate representation of new services and manual data processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the utility of the PharmaTrend system with the previously used Pharmacy Productivity Unit (PPU) system.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of PharmaTrend as a pharmacy workload measurement and management tool.
  • To identify the advantages and limitations of PharmaTrend in a hospital setting.

Main Methods:

  • A 352-bed general acute-care hospital implemented the PPU system in 1976.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The PPU system assigned standard times to drug distribution activities and constant times to miscellaneous tasks.
  • The hospital transitioned to the PharmaTrend system in January 1988, which integrates workload, financial, personnel, and patient admission data.

    • Main Results:

    • PharmaTrend facilitated easier data collection and offered robust report-generation capabilities.
    • The system successfully integrated non-drug distribution activities and provided data for staffing and financial reporting.
    • Limitations of the PPU system, such as inadequate representation of new services and manual data manipulation, were resolved.
    • A key limitation persisted: valid inter-hospital comparisons were hindered by inconsistent data reporting from participating institutions.

    Conclusions:

    • PharmaTrend represents a significant advancement over previous pharmacy workload monitoring systems.
    • The system enhances data analysis and application for internal hospital management and resource allocation.
    • Despite improvements, challenges remain in achieving standardized, comparative data across healthcare institutions.